Originally posted by 2LAP
How about you don't SPAM until the 'good time' is up? Check the forum rules on SPAM.
As yet you haven't posted any facts. Its the mystery that I find hard to swallow.
Please read the points 1 to 7 again. You have done no research and seem unable to describe or discuss this 'technique' in any way. Andrews posts contribute positively to this thread, yours do not.
This comment shows how little you know about cycling; Anquetil was not only a great cyclist because of the way he pedaled... he was also very fit and wasn't he a drug user? Given that you can do this technique, why are you not a rider of Anquetil's level?
I'm not trying to argue or be rude; just trying to avoid you SPAMING and TROLLING.
Fear not, I don't intend wasting any more time in anwering those
questions which I have already answered in earlier postings or
in trying to get the message across.
Q.2 is typical of the difficulty. If readers like yourself can see no
difference between a pedalling technique in which direct
downward pedal pressure is never used and that of round
pedalling, need any more be said on the subject. Maybe sometime
you should sit down and to try to describe on paper how round
pedalling is done because it's obvious that you do not understand
even that technique. Pedalling is not a pill that can be popped
into your mouth, you have got to use your brain.
On the subject of pills, while competitors in all sports will deny
taking drugs and try to prove their innocence by sometimes
claiming that it was their special training and technique that was
responsible for their improved performance, Anquetil was the
opposite and claimed that drugs were a necessity and never
mentioned his superior style of pedalling, I wonder why?
It must have given him great satisfaction, knowing that he was
a step above all other riders when it came to continuous solo
riding even after wining and dining into the early hours.