http://www.velonews.com/article/93220/fignon-facing-cancer-fight
Fignon's statement, "The (doping) products I took were intramuscular, they didn't pass through the stomach. So, no. If all the cyclists who doped would later have cancer, then everyone would have cancer...."
Sorry to hear of Fignon's cancer but another confirmation of doping (with whatever products available at the time) by the vast majority of pro riders through the ages. So the debate exists, if Fignon, Delgado and surely other GT contenders of the era doped, how did Lemond beat them if not to dope himself in some way. Could Lemond's current crusade against dopers be as credible as Lance's crusade against cancer?
Fignon's statement, "The (doping) products I took were intramuscular, they didn't pass through the stomach. So, no. If all the cyclists who doped would later have cancer, then everyone would have cancer...."
Sorry to hear of Fignon's cancer but another confirmation of doping (with whatever products available at the time) by the vast majority of pro riders through the ages. So the debate exists, if Fignon, Delgado and surely other GT contenders of the era doped, how did Lemond beat them if not to dope himself in some way. Could Lemond's current crusade against dopers be as credible as Lance's crusade against cancer?