General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

another scam study that has been widely quoted

Started by Tcomeau · · Last activity · 1 post · 357 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
24 December 2003
Last activity
24 December 2003
Original author
Tcomeau
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
357
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Coronary heart disease: prevalence and dietary sugars in Scotland C Bolton-Smith and M Woodward
    Cardiovascular Epidemiology Unit, University of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School.

    STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to investigate the effects of dietary intakes of different types of
    sugars (extrinsic, intrinsic, and lactose) and the dietary fat to sugar ratio on prevalent coronary
    heart disease (CHD). DESIGN--This was a baseline cross sectional survey of CHD risk factors. SETTING--
    Twenty two Scottish health districts were surveyed between 1984 and 1986. PARTICIPANTS--A total of
    10,359 men and women aged 40-59 years were screened as part of the Scottish Heart Health Study, and
    a further 1267 men and women aged 25-39 and 60-64 years were screened as part of the Scottish MONICA
    (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease) Study. The response rates were 74%
    and 64% respectively. METHODS--Subjects completed a questionnaire which included sociodemographic,
    health, and food frequency information. Medical history, response to the Rose chest pain
    questionnaire, and results of a 12 lead ECG recording were used to categorize subjects into CHD
    diagnosed, previously CHD undiagnosed, or no CHD groups. The chi 2 statistic was used to determine
    whether the CHD groups differed in their sugar consumption, and multiple logistic regression
    analysis, with adjustment for other potential coronary risk factors, was used to calculate odds
    ratios for prevalent CHD by intake fifths of dietary sugars. MAIN RESULTS--Men, but not women,
    differed in their sugar consumption by CHD group. The odds ratios showed a tendency for a U shaped
    relationship for extrinsic sugar intake with CHD prevalence, but no significant effect of the fat to
    sugar ratio (possible marker of obesity) on CHD was seen. CONCLUSIONS--The results suggest that
    neither extrinsic sugar, intrinsic sugar, nor the fat to sugar ratio are significant independent
    predictors of prevalent CHD in the Scottish population, when the other major risk factors such as
    cigarette smoking, blood cholesterol concentration, and antioxidant vitamins intake are accounted
    for. These new data for different sugar types agree with the consensus view that total sugar intake
    is not a major marker of coronary heart disease.

    Dr Caroline Bolton-Smith Head of Nutritional Epidemiology, Medical Research Council Resource Centre
    for Human Nutrition Research in Cambridge.

    admin.cam.ac.ukclinicalmedicine7c.html

    She is a colleague of the infamous flour industry shill Dr. Susan Jebb and they both work for an
    institution that has accepted a lot of cash from the UK flour industry.

    Cambridge University has a other close relationships with various industries including
    pharmaceutical and food industry:

    cpi.cam.ac.ukcpi.cam.ac.uk

    TC

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.