They are good and necessary questions, JethroFW. Don't evade
them; answer them. Don't lie, either; answer them honestly.
Why do you think the factlette that livestock "only" live
because we breed them to consume them merits any
consideration? EVERYONE is already aware of it, so it
couldn't be that you thought perhaps some weren't. You are
posting in alt.philosophy, so presumably you think it's a
*philosophical* importance. What is it, JethroFW? Do not
repeat your evasion: that it's important because it's a
fact. I have already acknowledged that it's a fact; a
factlette, actually. That is not in dispute, and that
logically cannot be the reason you emphasize it so often.
There must be some other, philosophical reason. What is
it, JethroFW?
For whom or what is it "better"/"more moral" that livestock
"get to experience life"?
Why have you evaded, for over a week, answering these two
very good and very necessary questions, JethroFW? Are you
afraid of answering them?