A
Anth
Guest
I never said single trial. If I try this and nothing comes out then the argument that it's just the
combination of the oils etc making the stones is bunkum. If something comes out and I mail it off to
a lab I can have it analysed. To my knowledge I have no stones. I have posted the ideal way to test
it, which I cannot do because I don't have access to a scanner. Anth
<Rich.@.> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:07:12 -0000, "Anth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >If nothing comes out then it's bunkum.
>
> You will conclude it is bunkum if a single trial fails???
>
> What if you have no stones to come out??
>
> What if it only works 95% of the time and you are the 5% it does not work??
>
> Not much of a scientist are you Anth??
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
> >Anth
> >
> >"Orac" <[email protected]> wrote in message newsrac-
> >[email protected]...
> >> In article <[email protected]>, "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the alternative approaches are not
> >> > going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone
else
> >says
> >> > . I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my
doctor
> >,
> >>
> >> HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver and gallbladder before the
> >> treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have ultrasound studies done before
> >> and after the
flushes
> >> that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and
> >> submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two
> >> questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does.
> >>
> >> [Snip]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> |
> >> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> The best defense to logic is ignorance
combination of the oils etc making the stones is bunkum. If something comes out and I mail it off to
a lab I can have it analysed. To my knowledge I have no stones. I have posted the ideal way to test
it, which I cannot do because I don't have access to a scanner. Anth
<Rich.@.> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 01:07:12 -0000, "Anth" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >If nothing comes out then it's bunkum.
>
> You will conclude it is bunkum if a single trial fails???
>
> What if you have no stones to come out??
>
> What if it only works 95% of the time and you are the 5% it does not work??
>
> Not much of a scientist are you Anth??
>
> Aloha,
>
> Rich
>
> >Anth
> >
> >"Orac" <[email protected]> wrote in message newsrac-
> >[email protected]...
> >> In article <[email protected]>, "Bew" <qw@nonamewhatsover> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Anth , What you need to realise is that those who ridicule the alternative approaches are not
> >> > going to be swayed no matter what you or anyone
else
> >says
> >> > . I have done the flush many times and I know it works as does my
doctor
> >,
> >>
> >> HOW do you know it "works"? Did you have an ultrasound of the liver and gallbladder before the
> >> treatment confirming that you actually had stones? Do you have ultrasound studies done before
> >> and after the
flushes
> >> that shows a decrease in the number of stones? Did you actually find stones in your stool and
> >> submit them for analysis to show that they actually are stones? If the answer to the last two
> >> questions is "no," you don't know the flush "works." You only think or assume it does.
> >>
> >> [Snip]
> >>
> >> --
> >> Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
> >> |
> >> |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you inconvenience me with questions?"
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> The best defense to logic is ignorance