Anyone care to explain this?!



"Andrew Swan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ifOib.206
> Maybe greater triangulation => more stiffness/strength for same/less

weight?

You'd think that'd be the idea behind it, but it'd be
hard to lose the extra weight I think. Setup would
be painful too I reckon.

> P.S. www.tinyurl.com is great for posting long URLs like the one

above -
> saves people having to copy and paste extra bits into their address

bars...

Thanks man! I've seen those tinyurls for a while but never visited
the site. Takes seconds to changed the long one into a nice short
one. I'll definately try and use that from now on. Should've tried
that ages ago! :)

hippy
 
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003 18:17:58 +1000, Andrew Swan wrote:


> P.S. www.tinyurl.com is great for posting long URLs like the one above -
> saves people having to copy and paste extra bits into their address bars...


Agreed, but if tinyurl ever goes bust, all these links will
be borken. Not such a big deal for a one-off, but any links
you find in google-groups (or any other forum) will be useless.

-kt
 
"kingsley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:p[email protected]...
> Agreed, but if tinyurl ever goes bust, all these links will
> be borken. Not such a big deal for a one-off, but any links
> you find in google-groups (or any other forum) will be useless.


What IS with the stupid wrapping on newsgroups anway?
How many people still use DOS? Tell me *NIX news
readers can't be slightly altered to deal with more text?

I'm sick of Outlook Express (yeah yeah laugh it up!)
wrapping lines in my posts stupidly.

grumbling hippy