If you do the odd run from time to time buy the S625X which comes std. with a foot pod to tell pace,speed and distance when running and then buy seperate speed and cadence sensors for the bikesevenrider310 said:Im thinking about buying the s725...any problems? or praises?
Unless you need to see the data on your phone, who not get a 720, which is cheaper, and in every important respect the same monitor?sevenrider310 said:Im thinking about buying the s725...any problems? or praises?
Unless you need to see the data on your phone, who not get a 720, which is cheaper, and in every important respect the same monitor?sevenrider310 said:Im thinking about buying the s725...any problems? or praises?
jon_stewart said:Unless you need to see the data on your phone, who not get a 720, which is cheaper, and in every important respect the same monitor?
I love my 720
jon_stewart said:Unless you need to see the data on your phone, who not get a 720, which is cheaper, and in every important respect the same monitor?
I love my 720
sevenrider310 said:There is one HUGE upgrade to the 725 I found out...the hear rate strap is a million times more comfy...its the new mesh type ...I think for that alone its worth it...I dont know anyone who uses it to downloaded to their Nokia..lol
DeanC said:I'm pretty sure you can use the new strap with the 720 (Polar's web site says they're compatible), it just doesn't come bundled.
Dean
I purchased the S725 one month ago, and I think is an amazing piece of work. No complaints so far, except for the low alarm-beep signal, and not being able to use the alarm while storing bike info (speed, cadence, ...).sevenrider310 said:You cant..cause of Owncode....each strap is coded for unit...
**** Sorry****sevenrider310 said:You cant..cause of Owncode....each strap is coded for unit...
the own code actually applies to when the polar first starts up. the watch checks the signal with the strap and makes sure that it only takes information from the id of the strap it initally linked to, this stops it from getting interference from other users. A big help when you get a bunch of you with HRM.sevenrider310 said:You cant..cause of Owncode....each strap is coded for unit...
upstateSC-rider said:Isn't the other difference between the 725 and 720 is that the 725 can display your HR as a % of max?
Anyway, I have a 725 and love it. I just have to get an IR interface so I can get my damn data onto the pc to plot some graphs.
Lou.
Love my Polar - it's great to have all that data integrated together. Do you really need it? Probably not, but it's a nice toy and I definitely get some motivation from filling up the training calender.sevenrider310 said:Im thinking about buying the s725...any problems? or praises?
I think that may be right about the % hr.upstateSC-rider said:Isn't the other difference between the 725 and 720 is that the 725 can display your HR as a % of max?
Anyway, I have a 725 and love it. I just have to get an IR interface so I can get my damn data onto the pc to plot some graphs.
Lou.
Hrm. I bought one with my 720 a couple of weeks ago because my old Latitude CS has no IR port and it works fine with the 2k install have on it. I *did* to install the software first to get the drivers to load correctly.jon_stewart said:I think that may be right about the % hr.
BTW, my recommendation would be not to buy a polar IR interface. There seem to be rather a lot of problems with them particular with XP and W2k setups (I have 5 such, and it doesn't work with any of them!)
%hr of max is a pretty std polar feature, should be on both.jon_stewart said:I think that may be right about the % hr.
BTW, my recommendation would be not to buy a polar IR interface. There seem to be rather a lot of problems with them particular with XP and W2k setups (I have 5 such, and it doesn't work with any of them!)
Thanks to DeanC as well. I think I might contact Polar and see what their exchange policy is like.KakenBetaal said:%hr of max is a pretty std polar feature, should be on both.
I also have the Polar IR port since my computer didn't have an IR port. Works great, but I did read mention of needing a new version of the Polar IR hardware for it to be able to work with WinXP.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.