Approx weight of a Trek 4500?



Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Badger South

Guest
Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500 hard tail MTN bike.

Anyone have the figures?

Thx!

-B
 
B

Badger South

Guest
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:21:37 +0800, "Van Weng Koon" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Badger South" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500 hard tail MTN bike.
>>
>> Anyone have the figures?
>>

>About 27 lb.
>
>VWK

Thanks, Van.

So that makes an interesting range of about 45lbs for a WalGoose, at one end to the 3lbs for a
top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)

-B
 
B

B A R R Y B U R

Guest
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:

>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)

What racing bike is 3 pounds?

Barry
 
B

Badger South

Guest
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:09:43 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
<[email protected]> wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)
>
>What racing bike is 3 pounds?
>
>Barry

Oops, wheel weight is not incl. in that measurement. I just looked at the final number.

Trek D4 5900

Frame 1000grams Fork 339gm
----------------------------
1339gms (2.96 lbs)

-B
 
B

B A R R Y B U R

Guest
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:25:54 -0500, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 23:09:43 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 10:38:16 -0500, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>one end to the 3lbs for a top-of-the-line racing bike! ;-)
>>
>>What racing bike is 3 pounds?
>>
>>Barry
>
>Oops, wheel weight is not incl. in that measurement. I just looked at the final number.
>
>Trek D4 5900
>
>Frame 1000grams Fork 339gm
>----------------------------
> 1339gms (2.96 lbs)

Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels attached to a frame will not be
a very good ride! <G>

Barry
 
R

Rick Onanian

Guest
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:39 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels attached to a frame will not
>be a very good ride! <G>

I expect that fixie riders would enjoy it; they ride fixies for the simplicity and the better
road feel...

>Barry
--
Rick Onanian
 
R

Rick Onanian

Guest
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:50:58 GMT, John Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 2003-11-23, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500 hard tail MTN bike.
>>
>> Anyone have the figures?
>
>Laden or unladen? :)

African or European?
--
Rick Onanian
 
B

B A R R Y B U R

Guest
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:45:52 -0500, Rick Onanian <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 00:00:39 GMT, B a r r y B u r k e J r .
><[email protected]> wrote:
>>Wheel weight? You'd also need the rest of the parts. A set of wheels attached to a frame will not
>>be a very good ride! <G>
>
>I expect that fixie riders would enjoy it; they ride fixies for the simplicity and the better
>road feel...

Even fixies have handlebars, stems, seatposts, saddles, crankes, pedals, chains, and sometimes,
brakes, no? <G>

Barry
 
T

Tom Sherman

Guest
Rick Onanian wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:50:58 GMT, John Thompson <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On 2003-11-23, Badger South <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Haven't been able to find the weight of a basic Trek 41,43 or 4500 hard tail MTN bike.
> >>
> >> Anyone have the figures?
> >
> >Laden or unladen? :)
>
> African or European?

We want..... A SHRUBBERY!!!!

Tom Sherman - Planet Earth
 
Status
Not open for further replies.