The recent exchange of views between **** Pound of WADA and
Lance Armstrong is very interesting.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with Pound's view, he does reflect, at least in my experience, the perception of the general public, when it comes to the sport of cycling, that cycling is premised upon the use of drugs and that the peleton is, in parts, fuelled by drugs.
Perhaps this perception is created because 'the average joe' can't comprehend how cyclists can cycle thousands and thousands of mile each year.
I would be a very rich man if I got a euro (dollar !) for every time,
I have heard the response "sure they must be taking something"
- when I mention my interest in cycling to people who have no knowledge of our sport.
The questions that I would like to pose to the Forum is this -
Do the posters here think that there are any clean cyclists in the peleton ?
Are we, as cyclists, deluding ourselves to the extent of cheating in our sport ?
Does **** Pound have a valid point, given the continous controveries that beset our sport ?
Lance Armstrong is very interesting.
Whether one agrees or disagrees with Pound's view, he does reflect, at least in my experience, the perception of the general public, when it comes to the sport of cycling, that cycling is premised upon the use of drugs and that the peleton is, in parts, fuelled by drugs.
Perhaps this perception is created because 'the average joe' can't comprehend how cyclists can cycle thousands and thousands of mile each year.
I would be a very rich man if I got a euro (dollar !) for every time,
I have heard the response "sure they must be taking something"
- when I mention my interest in cycling to people who have no knowledge of our sport.
The questions that I would like to pose to the Forum is this -
Do the posters here think that there are any clean cyclists in the peleton ?
Are we, as cyclists, deluding ourselves to the extent of cheating in our sport ?
Does **** Pound have a valid point, given the continous controveries that beset our sport ?