Rewind to Bruyneel's poor strategic choice while at Discovery of hiring Ivan Basso to ride with the team. It is a mistake he finally owned up to about a year ago in an interview.
He is making a similar poor strategic choice by hiring Lance to ride for Astana.
it is a huge gamble -- if Lance wins again, it would be a fantasy come true on many levels. If Lance cannot come back to Tour racing form in the pre-season, or he fades during the Tour, it will be a disaster.
Complicating the gamble is the Contador & Leipheimer factor. Why should Contador play second fiddle to Lance? Contador arguably is the best rider in the peleton (Tour, Giro, Vuelta wins). Lance should have to work for him.
Leiphemer, on the other hand, is 34 years old and only has 1 or 2 Tours left in him. He can probably stomach supporting Contador, but why should he ride for both Contador AND Lance?
I am a Lance fan, so one one hand, i am excited for his comeback. on the other hand, I think he should have found a different team that truly needed a leader, or even a strong right hand man for the existing eam leader. Astana has both and Lance is the 3rd wheel and will demand star billing at teh expense of Contador or Leipheimer.
Lance & Bruyneel might loose Contador and/or Leipheimer in the process. If so, Astana might be left with a team that is 100% reliant on a 38 year old comeback kid. Again, a great return if the wager pays off -- a very stupid move if the bet falls through.