Armstrong runs NY Marathon in 2h59:37
- Thread starter sopas
- Start date
Well then, get some jucie and jump on the bike. I expect to you win the TDF next year (and then the next six...) If it's that easy, what are you waiting on?Bro Deal said:
L
poulidor said:
You're wrong, as usual, poulidor.
As P'Ranger CORRECTLY put it, the allegations published by the muckrakers in L'Equipe WERE proven to be "riddled with falsehoods, poor testing procedures, and lack of accountability." If you want to believe the lies that paper put forward, be my guest, but their case would get LAUGHED OUT of a court of law.
Proven ? Do you have a proof other the laughable and botched report of Vrijman-Verbbrugghen?wineandkeyz said:
Who is the most often right ? Laws or Sciences?
And don't forget, LA did not prefer sue L'Equipe, WHY ?
In France muckracking is severly punished.
No, you are wrong as usual. The Vrijman report was nothing but a whitewash that never addressed the central issue: How EPO was found in six of Armstrong's retrotested urine samples. Instead the report side stepped the issue by saying that in order to have a positive, you have to follow the a certain testing protocol. But the testing was never done for sanctioning purposes; it was done for research, so the lab did not need to follow protocol to get the data they were after. The lab stands by its findings and they have never been refuted.wineandkeyz said:
In order to win the '99 Tour, Armstrong was on more dope than Timothy Leary. That is a fact and no matter how much you Armstrong homers bleat about French conspiracies, or what ever clap trap is your latest excuse, it does not change the facts.
In a court, Armstrong would be crushed with the preponderance of evidence for his doping.
Bro, you are ON FIRE today. Some of your best stuff. Really. Excellent.Bro Deal said:
Lamkin, take note.
So Lance knew he was running in the marathon for some time. He had a former winner pacing him. He has obviously contacts at Nike. AND he claims to never have run more than 16 miles before. He is either ridiculously cocky or just plain stupid. I am thinking cocky. Someone must have told him that you have to do the mileage. He must've blown them off. Wasn't he a triathlete back in the day too? They run; many of their runs at the pro level are marathons e.g., the original Hawaii Ironman. It must be humbling for him to know that a 70 year old man (checked some age records) could beat him, the cycling machine God-Idol guy. We can probably all agree that he's clean now. 
Hey, I heard that that 70 year old man was breathing harder than Armstrong.Meek One said:It must be humbling for him to know that a 70 year old man (checked some age records) could beat him, the cycling machine God-Idol guy. We can probably all agree that he's clean now.
He raised $600,000 for cancer research with his fellow Foundation runners.Meek One said:
Meanwhile, over in the Protour we have JU saying that he soon will find a home. Fuentes gets to continue in the sport and we find out in a drug trial going on that involves at least 10 people, that the head of the French doping police is the very same doctor who was the head doper.......
But Lance raised $600,000 for cancer research.
"Lance simply won't go away."
wolfix said:
I didn't say he didn't do the 'run' for a good cause and generate some great money for cancer research, which he did and should be commended for. I just think his performance sucked for someone who just recently retired from a cardio sport and has a running background (triathlete).
