General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Article: Bite makes way for brain

Started by Robert Karl Sto · · Last activity · 5 posts · 529 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
25 March 2004
Last activity
29 March 2004
Original author
Robert Karl Sto
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
529
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Bite makes way for brain A single mutation may have caused
    gross anatomical changes that spurred human evolution By
    Brendan A Maher March 24, 2004

    A pile of evidence from disparate disciplines indicates that
    a single change in a single gene-MYH16-may be responsible
    for significant morphologic differences between humans and
    other primates, including possibly the three-fold increase
    in brain size that set the earliest species of [censored] apart
    from their kin. This is the first protein disparity between
    humans and chimps that can be correlated to drastic
    anatomical changes seen in the fossil record, according to a
    group of University of Pennsylvania researchers who
    published a letter in the March 25 issue of Nature.

    "This is a brilliant piece of detective work that has
    enormous implications for medicine, biology, evolution,
    molecular genetics, [and] the human genome," said Frederick
    S. Kaplan, a professor of orthopedic molecular medicine at
    Penn who was not part of the study. "By relegating a gene to
    the evolutionary garbage heap, we were able to lift the
    constraints to the development of human complexity," he told
    The Scientist.

    Powerful muscles for biting practically dominate the cranial
    structures of most primates, including gorillas, chimps, and
    extinct Australopithecus and Paranthropus species. A gene
    responsible for a majority of jaw musculature was lost from
    human ancestors, presumably 2.4 million years ago, according
    to the study. Drastic reductions in these muscles may have
    lifted significant physical constraints on braincase volume,
    allowing primates with weak jaws and big brains to
    eventually think about their origins.

    Read the rest at The Scientist dot com
    biomedcentral.com04

    Posted by Robert Karl Stonjek.

  2. in article [email hidden], Robert Karl Stonjek at
    [email hidden] wrote on 25/3/04 11:43 AM:

    Quoted message said:

    "This is a brilliant piece of detective work that has
    enormous implications for medicine, biology, evolution,
    molecular genetics, [and] the human genome," said
    Frederick S. Kaplan, a professor of orthopedic molecular
    medicine at Penn who was not part of the study. "By
    relegating a gene to the evolutionary garbage heap, we
    were able to lift the constraints to the development of
    human complexity," he told The Scientist.

    --

    Phillip Smith Phills at co.nz replace bugger with ihug applied-applied-
    evolution.co.nz

    "he who is smeared with blubber has the kindest heart" -- a
    Greenland Eskimo adage

    With out reading the original paper it seems to me they have
    it back to front surely the increase in brain complexity
    allowed the mutation to be fixed

  3. phillip smith <[email hidden]> wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "By relegating a gene to the evolutionary garbage heap,
    we were able to lift the constraints to the development
    of human complexity," he told The Scientist.

    Quoted message said:

    With out reading the original paper it seems to me they
    have it back to front surely the increase in brain
    complexity allowed the mutation to be fixed

    I agree.

    Quoted message said:

    From reading this article on gets the feeling that


    these scientists are ignoring the most important part of the
    equation: they don't indicate an "selective engine" of
    hominid brain growth. Instead it seems they have assumed
    that hominid brain growth would be inevitable once the
    constraints are removed.

    The equation they seem to propose goes as follows:

    Decrease in jaw muscles enables increase in brain growth.

    The equation that I would propose goes as follows:

    Social complexity is the engine of human brain growth, large
    jaw muscles (which were especially necessary for Apiths to
    process the hard, dried-out foods associated with the dry
    season of their monsoon habitat) constrain brain growth but
    don't prevent it, brain growth eventually enables tool usage
    (about 2.5 to 3.0 mya), tool usage leads to more processed
    foodstuffs including meat, more processed foodstuffs leads
    to reduction of size of jaw muscle, reduction of size of jaw
    muscles removes the constraint of brain growth.

    Jim

  4. "Jim McGinn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    phillip smith <[email hidden]> wrote

    Social complexity is the engine of human brain growth,
    large jaw muscles (which were especially necessary for
    Apiths to process the hard, dried-out foods associated
    with the dry season of their monsoon habitat) constrain
    brain growth but don't prevent it, brain growth eventually
    enables tool usage (about 2.5 to 3.0 mya), tool usage
    leads to more processed foodstuffs including meat, more
    processed foodstuffs leads to reduction of size of jaw
    muscle, reduction of size of jaw muscles removes the
    constraint of brain growth.

    Just to make sure you won't miss the pleasure of reading
    J.M. Howard's post here in sbe:

    "Myosin Gene Mutations" may support "Androgens in Human
    Evolution"

    Excerpt: "....Using the coding sequence for the myosin rod
    domains as a molecular clock, we estimate that this mutation
    appeared ***approximately
    2.4 million years ago***, predating the appearance of modern
    human body size and emigration of [censored] from Africa. This
    represents the first proteomic distinction between humans
    and chimpanzees that can be correlated with a traceable
    anatomic imprint in the fossil record."

    P

  5. Peter F. said:

    "Jim McGinn" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    "]news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    phillip smith <[email hidden]> wrote

    Social complexity is the engine of human brain growth,
    large jaw muscles (which were especially necessary for
    Apiths to process the hard, dried-out foods associated
    with the dry season of their monsoon habitat) constrain
    brain growth but don't prevent it, brain growth
    eventually enables tool usage (about 2.5 to 3.0 mya),
    tool usage leads to more processed foodstuffs including
    meat, more processed foodstuffs leads to reduction of
    size of jaw muscle, reduction of size of jaw muscles
    removes the constraint of brain growth.

    Just to make sure you won't miss the pleasure of reading
    J.M. Howard's post here in sbe:

    "Myosin Gene Mutations" may support "Androgens in Human
    Evolution"

    Excerpt: "....Using the coding sequence for the myosin rod
    domains as a molecular clock, we estimate that this
    mutation appeared ***approximately
    2.4 million years ago***, predating the appearance of
    modern human body size and emigration of [censored] from
    Africa. This represents the first proteomic distinction
    between humans and chimpanzees that can be correlated
    with a traceable anatomic imprint in the fossil record."

    P


    Just to make it clear, Peter quoted a part of the abstract
    of Stedman, et al., that is included in my paper. Peter
    quoted none of my work.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.