N
Nathaniel Porte
Guest
"David Hansen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:31:16 +0100 someone who may be "Nathaniel Porter"
> <[email protected]> wrote this:-
>
> >Of course, alternative routes would have to be provided for non-motorway traffic - these would be
> >largely empty, as most traffic would use the
m'way.
>
> That was the claim when motorways were built. Experience shows that the claim was generally false.
>
I don't know where you live, but in my experience non-motorway routes running alongside motorways as
usually deserted (unless they form part of another major route)
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 17:31:16 +0100 someone who may be "Nathaniel Porter"
> <[email protected]> wrote this:-
>
> >Of course, alternative routes would have to be provided for non-motorway traffic - these would be
> >largely empty, as most traffic would use the
m'way.
>
> That was the claim when motorways were built. Experience shows that the claim was generally false.
>
I don't know where you live, but in my experience non-motorway routes running alongside motorways as
usually deserted (unless they form part of another major route)