I have read the dialogue between Dr Chung and Mozz very carefully. I observe that Dr.Chung (with all due respect) consistently reaches a point in his argument whereby he seems to be unable to further support his reasoning and therefore suggests that Mozz 'takes his word for it'. I find this a curious suggestion from one who professes to 'know' "God". If our legal brains used this argument the justice system would collapse round our ears. Whereas Mozz seems to welcome open debate and dissent whilst successfully offering what I view as a substantial case for Buddhism and it's teachings. Might I invite Mozz to contact me directly with the view to advising me as I have an interest in pursuing Buddhism in more detail. Can you advise please Mozz?