Being Right is not Fundamental



urge2kill

Member
Aug 13, 2013
448
20
0
I'm easily distracted, that's what's wrong with me.

Thank you for respecting my masochism. I'm completely humiliated.
 

Volnix

Well-Known Member
Feb 19, 2011
2,883
281
63
Originally Posted by urge2kill I'm easily distracted, that's what's wrong with me.

Thank you for respecting my masochism. I'm completely humiliated.

Ok, so you did binge-surfed Youtube once
big-smile.png
... It could happen to anybody!
big-smile.png


How about a nice bloat-ware remover?
big-smile.png



Advanced Uninstaller Pro:

http://www.advanceduninstaller.com/


0.jpg
 

urge2kill

Member
Aug 13, 2013
448
20
0
Hey Volnix, I've been trying to think of a way to convince people to invest in longevity research, and by golly I think I got it!

If we were immortal (lived forever), we could have infinite pleasure. That means the possibility of immortality has infinite expected value even if its probability is very low, therefore your money is best spent if you invest every last penny in longevity research.

Suddenly they're donating hundreds at a time. They're even shunning those who refuse to donate. It's a miracle!
 

urge2kill

Member
Aug 13, 2013
448
20
0
I know muslym indivisibles can be enlightened and consider it, but I don't believe in suppressing any potently well-informed discussion with treats of social exclusion. I think the charges agent I slam's critics may cause what gynecologists call "reactance"—when someone body thinks you're trying to manipulate their choice, they respond with the opposite. Reactance can be irrational, but is it aways? It no longer made sense to thrust in the populant viewpoint if its popularity may be due to treats of exclusion, so the guy attempts to overcondomsate for what she believes others have suppressed.