This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few days reading the messages on Bicycle Victoria's website I love you guys as the wit, humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't be beat. 
Belated Valentine's Day message...
- Thread starter SuzieB
- Start date
SuzieB said:This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few days reading the messages on Bicycle Victoria's website I love you guys as the wit, humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't be beat.
)))Shucks(((
Must admit tho the BV forum has improved since I first read it. It's kinda cute and slightly more innocent than a.b.
E
Euan
Guest
cfsmtb <[email protected]> writes:
> SuzieB Wrote:
>> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
>> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
>> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
>> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
>> be beat.
>
> )))Shucks(((
>
> Must admit tho the BV forum has improved since I first read it. It's
> kinda cute and slightly more innocent than a.b.
*looks around furtively*
I *am* innocent! Honest!!
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> SuzieB Wrote:
>> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
>> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
>> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
>> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
>> be beat.
>
> )))Shucks(((
>
> Must admit tho the BV forum has improved since I first read it. It's
> kinda cute and slightly more innocent than a.b.
*looks around furtively*
I *am* innocent! Honest!!
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
E
Euan
Guest
SuzieB <[email protected]> writes:
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> *looks around furtively*
>>
>> I *am* innocent! Honest!!
>> --
>> Cheers | ~~ __@
>> Euan | ~~ _-\<,
>> Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> Prehaps I should mention that my dear husband has been shocking the BV
> forums with his outlandish views on bike paths, ipods, clipless pedals.
> I am sure there is a helmet debate due soon.
Nah, not even I'm that masochistic!
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> *looks around furtively*
>>
>> I *am* innocent! Honest!!
>> --
>> Cheers | ~~ __@
>> Euan | ~~ _-\<,
>> Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> Prehaps I should mention that my dear husband has been shocking the BV
> forums with his outlandish views on bike paths, ipods, clipless pedals.
> I am sure there is a helmet debate due soon.
Nah, not even I'm that masochistic!
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
SuzieB said:Prehaps I should mention that my dear husband has been shocking the BV forums with his outlandish views on bike paths, ipods, clipless pedals. I am sure there is a helmet debate due soon.
what are these outlandish views, lad?
can't remember. left my memory somewhere over the indian ocean...
was totally wierdo seeing a guy wearing a helmet in Amsterdam (i WILL stop talking about it sometime, honest! November perhaps...).
He was getting wierdo looks from everyone too
))
E
Euan
Guest
flyingdutch <[email protected]> writes:
> SuzieB Wrote:
>> Prehaps I should mention that my dear husband has been shocking the BV
>> forums with his outlandish views on bike paths, ipods, clipless pedals.
>> I am sure there is a helmet debate due soon.
> what are these outlandish views, lad?
> can't remember. left my memory somewhere over the indian ocean...
Clipless pedals: once you've learned how to use them they're safer than
normal pedals.
Bike paths: poor utility to a transport cyclist, roads are safer and
more predictable environments.
iPods (more correctly using headphones) not inherently risky if used
appropriately.
> was totally wierdo seeing a guy wearing a helmet in Amsterdam (i WILL
> stop talking about it sometime, honest! November perhaps...).
> He was getting wierdo looks from everyone too))
I'm not biting, I'm not I'm not I'm not.....
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> SuzieB Wrote:
>> Prehaps I should mention that my dear husband has been shocking the BV
>> forums with his outlandish views on bike paths, ipods, clipless pedals.
>> I am sure there is a helmet debate due soon.
> what are these outlandish views, lad?
> can't remember. left my memory somewhere over the indian ocean...
Clipless pedals: once you've learned how to use them they're safer than
normal pedals.
Bike paths: poor utility to a transport cyclist, roads are safer and
more predictable environments.
iPods (more correctly using headphones) not inherently risky if used
appropriately.
> was totally wierdo seeing a guy wearing a helmet in Amsterdam (i WILL
> stop talking about it sometime, honest! November perhaps...).
> He was getting wierdo looks from everyone too
))I'm not biting, I'm not I'm not I'm not.....
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
Euan said:
ppffttt. Australian ones yes. some_other_country's_bikepaths No.
helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate.
E
Euan
Guest
flyingdutch <[email protected]> writes:
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Bike paths: poor utility to a transport cyclist, roads are safer and
>> more predictable environments.
>>
>>
>
> ppffttt. Australian ones yes. some_other_country's_bikepaths No.
>
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate.
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate.
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate.
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Sod it, Goat next week
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Bike paths: poor utility to a transport cyclist, roads are safer and
>> more predictable environments.
>>
>>
>
> ppffttt. Australian ones yes. some_other_country's_bikepaths No.
>
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate.
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate.
> helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet debate. helmet
> debate.
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
Sod it, Goat next week
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
Euan said:Sod it, Goat next week
stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush! stoush!
cfsmtb said:
i think you meant:
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
T
TimC
Guest
On 2006-02-15, cfsmtb (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Sod it, Goat next week
>>
>
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
--
TimC
>Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function.
You're saying cats are the opposite of bijectiveness? -- ST in RHOD
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Sod it, Goat next week
>>
>
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
--
TimC
>Cats are intended to teach us that not everything in nature has a function.
You're saying cats are the opposite of bijectiveness? -- ST in RHOD
T
TimC
Guest
On 2006-02-15, flyingdutch (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> i think you meant:
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
Hey dutchy, I don't think we are predictable enough
<looking forward to their wheatbier they alluded to last time I was
there>
--
TimC
"Some people think that noise abatement should be a higher priority for ATC. I
say safety is noise abatement. You have no idea how much noise it makes to have
a 737 fall out of the sky after an accident." -- anon. air traffic controller
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> i think you meant:
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
> stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout! stout!
> stout!
Hey dutchy, I don't think we are predictable enough
<looking forward to their wheatbier they alluded to last time I was
there>
--
TimC
"Some people think that noise abatement should be a higher priority for ATC. I
say safety is noise abatement. You have no idea how much noise it makes to have
a 737 fall out of the sky after an accident." -- anon. air traffic controller
D
dave
Guest
SuzieB wrote:
> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
> be beat.
>
>
Gawd..
What DO you want?
Dave
> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
> be beat.
>
>
Gawd..
What DO you want?
Dave
E
Euan
Guest
flyingdutch <[email protected]> writes:
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>>
>>
>
> Keep you Goat's butt out of this, kinky fecker
If only you knew....
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
> Euan Wrote:
>>
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal
>> Rebuttal Rebuttal Rebuttal
>>
>>
>
> Keep you Goat's butt out of this, kinky fecker
If only you knew....
--
Cheers | ~~ __@
Euan | ~~ _-\<,
Melbourne, Australia | ~ (*)/ (*)
T
TimC
Guest
On 2006-02-15, dave (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> SuzieB wrote:
>> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
>> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
>> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
>> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
>> be beat.
>>
> Gawd..
>
> What DO you want?
Choclit.
But she's too late
--
TimC
We would be called technicians, not researchers, if we knew
what we were doing
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> SuzieB wrote:
>> This is just a little note to let you all know that after spending a few
>> days reading the messages on 'Bicycle Victoria'
>> (http://www.bv.com.au/forums/)'s website I love you guys as the wit,
>> humour and generally INTELLIGENT conversation on aus.bicycle just can't
>> be beat.
>>
> Gawd..
>
> What DO you want?
Choclit.
But she's too late
--
TimC
We would be called technicians, not researchers, if we knew
what we were doing
TimC said:Hey dutchy, I don't think we are predictable enough
Ok then,
Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips! Chips!
and small pizzas.