R
R Brickston
Guest
On Sat, 09 Sep 2006 18:14:00 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>R Brickston wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:43:56 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob wrote:
>>>> Bill Baka wrote:
>>
>>> Bob,
>>> I have personally experienced bad cops and bad judges AND bad D.A.'s.
>>> I have been given totally bogus traffic tickets by a group of cops
>>> setting up a speed trap in a place where it was physically impossible to
>>> speed. They had each other to back themselves up and I was a lone
>>> commuter in my car.
>>> Corrupt.
>>
>> So you couldn't come back with a camera to detail this alleged
>> impossibilty in court?
>
>I did that once when a cop singled me out of a line of cars making a
>left turn to go to a junk yard in 1966. That was standard practice and
>happened all day long. The cop hinted (under his breath) that he wanted
>to make sure to get teenagers to give them respect for the law. It had
>the opposite effect. I stood out there and took a whole roll of picture
>of cars, sometimes convoys, crossing that line and the judge refused to
>look at them, telling me that, "So what, they were breaking the law,
>too". Then why the hell did that sorry assed excuse for a cop single me
>out? Because I was a teen and least likely to get a lawyer. When I said
>not guilty and I wanted a trial with a lawyer he said "sorry, you can't
>have a trial over a traffic ticket so I find you 'Guilty'".
>I sure gained a LOT of respect for the law that day. Like ****.
Those things always have to be taken to the next court. Probably not
an option for a teenager, but with patience, since you claim to have a
132+ IQ, it could have been done.
>>
>>> I have been arrested for DUI even though I was neither drunk nor even
>>> driving. When I demanded a blood test the technician said "clean" but
>>> the officer demanded he mark is as a positive. Santa Clara city P.D.
>>> Corrupt #2.
>>> When I went to court on this the D.A. said he would accept a plea
>>> bargain for "Dry reckless" but if I plead not guilty he could guarantee
>>> jail time.
>>> Corrupt D.A.
>>
>> This is far fetched and stretches the imagination.
>
>Everything stretches your feeble imagination, doofus.
Who you calling "doofus," Doofus. In any event the only things that
stretch the imagination are those events that occur on Planet Baka.
>
>If this alleged
>> incident occurred, the drill would be to get the tech to testify under
>> oath in court.
>
>Requiring a lawyer, most of whom want about $2,000 up front just to talk
>to you, much less do the leg work for a traffic ticket. If I had $5K to
>blow I might have, but that was during one of my work droughts. Soon
>after I got a much better job up in the wine country and never saw
>another Santa Clara cop. I won't drive down there now unless somebody I
>know dies or I have a 6 figure job offer, High 6 figure.
>Bill Baka
>
If your story is true, after all it is an event that took place on
Planet Baka, you file a subpoena for the tech to appear, prior to the
court date. Then, the tech has a career decision to make, he either
lies under oath or tells the DA what actually happened, if the latter,
your case gets dropped.
>R Brickston wrote:
>> On Fri, 08 Sep 2006 21:43:56 GMT, Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob wrote:
>>>> Bill Baka wrote:
>>
>>> Bob,
>>> I have personally experienced bad cops and bad judges AND bad D.A.'s.
>>> I have been given totally bogus traffic tickets by a group of cops
>>> setting up a speed trap in a place where it was physically impossible to
>>> speed. They had each other to back themselves up and I was a lone
>>> commuter in my car.
>>> Corrupt.
>>
>> So you couldn't come back with a camera to detail this alleged
>> impossibilty in court?
>
>I did that once when a cop singled me out of a line of cars making a
>left turn to go to a junk yard in 1966. That was standard practice and
>happened all day long. The cop hinted (under his breath) that he wanted
>to make sure to get teenagers to give them respect for the law. It had
>the opposite effect. I stood out there and took a whole roll of picture
>of cars, sometimes convoys, crossing that line and the judge refused to
>look at them, telling me that, "So what, they were breaking the law,
>too". Then why the hell did that sorry assed excuse for a cop single me
>out? Because I was a teen and least likely to get a lawyer. When I said
>not guilty and I wanted a trial with a lawyer he said "sorry, you can't
>have a trial over a traffic ticket so I find you 'Guilty'".
>I sure gained a LOT of respect for the law that day. Like ****.
Those things always have to be taken to the next court. Probably not
an option for a teenager, but with patience, since you claim to have a
132+ IQ, it could have been done.
>>
>>> I have been arrested for DUI even though I was neither drunk nor even
>>> driving. When I demanded a blood test the technician said "clean" but
>>> the officer demanded he mark is as a positive. Santa Clara city P.D.
>>> Corrupt #2.
>>> When I went to court on this the D.A. said he would accept a plea
>>> bargain for "Dry reckless" but if I plead not guilty he could guarantee
>>> jail time.
>>> Corrupt D.A.
>>
>> This is far fetched and stretches the imagination.
>
>Everything stretches your feeble imagination, doofus.
Who you calling "doofus," Doofus. In any event the only things that
stretch the imagination are those events that occur on Planet Baka.
>
>If this alleged
>> incident occurred, the drill would be to get the tech to testify under
>> oath in court.
>
>Requiring a lawyer, most of whom want about $2,000 up front just to talk
>to you, much less do the leg work for a traffic ticket. If I had $5K to
>blow I might have, but that was during one of my work droughts. Soon
>after I got a much better job up in the wine country and never saw
>another Santa Clara cop. I won't drive down there now unless somebody I
>know dies or I have a 6 figure job offer, High 6 figure.
>Bill Baka
>
If your story is true, after all it is an event that took place on
Planet Baka, you file a subpoena for the tech to appear, prior to the
court date. Then, the tech has a career decision to make, he either
lies under oath or tells the DA what actually happened, if the latter,
your case gets dropped.