Australia and New Zealand · Public discussion

Bicycle drag vital statistix

Started by Kingsley · · Last activity · 4 posts · 682 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Australia and New Zealand
Published
24 May 2007
Last activity
24 May 2007
Original author
Kingsley
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
682
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. A guy posted this the "Phreds" Bicycle touring list today, He doesn't cite
    the source, but I thought I'd post it here for chewing on.

    <quote>
    This was done by a physicist and is several years old. I cut and pasted
    it into my cycling file. He studied cat 1 and cat 2 racers in actual race
    conditions so they were probably on tubulars which have a little more
    rolling resistance than clinchers and from what I remember there were many
    hills:

    Bicycle Drag losses:

    60 % Rider Drag.

    12 % Rolling Resistance.

    10 % Wheel Drag of both kinds-this is aero drag both kinds spinning and
    progression, rolling resistance is above.

    8 % Bike drag includes entire bike and all components except for wheels.

    8 % Inertia of all kinds including rolling inertia of wheels. The wheel
    inertia is actually only about 1% of this overall figure and is almost
    negligible.

    2 % bearing friction and flex losses. etc.
    <end-quote>

    cheers,
    -kt

    --
    Kingsley Turner,
    http://MadDogsBreakfast.com/ABFAQ - news:aus.bicycle Frequenly Asked Questions

  2. On 2007-05-24, Kingsley (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:

    A guy posted this the "Phreds" Bicycle touring list today, He doesn't cite
    the source, but I thought I'd post it here for chewing on.


    ....

    Quoted message said:

    <quote>
    8 % Inertia of all kinds including rolling inertia of wheels. The wheel
    inertia is actually only about 1% of this overall figure and is almost
    negligible.
    <end-quote>

    Er, um... ok. What does this supposed physicist mean by this?

    --
    TimC
    "No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical." -- Niels Bohr

  3. You also have to take into account the drag of your uber flowing locks Timc! 🙂

  4. On 2007-05-24, gplama (aka Bruce)
    was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:

    Quoted message said:


    You also have to take into account the drag of your uber flowing locks
    Timc! 🙂

    I think a study found they were worth 10km/h, didn't it?

    -- Ti "conveniently ignoring laminar flow" mC.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.