E
Edward Dolan
Guest
"R Brickston" <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:04:46 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>R Brickston wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:34:31 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> So what leading Democrat
>>>
>>> Take your pick...
>>>
>>>> said those things (sincere beliefs) that would be
>>>> characterized as cooked intelligence (evil lies) if uttered by Bush?
>>
>>
>>> Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002
>>> "It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear
>>> weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist
>>> acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the
>>> united states."
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
>>> "If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is
>>> clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
>>> weapons of mass destruction program."
>>>
>>>
>>> Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998
>>> "We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and
>>> the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
>>> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
>>> destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region,
>>> and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
>>>
>>>
>>> Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002
>>> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
>>> developing weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002
>>> "There was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
>>> aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
>>> weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we
>>> have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development
>>> of weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe Biden > August 4, 2002
>>> "[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do,
>>> of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something
>>> terrible. That is true. But there's been no connection, hard
>>> connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or
>>> effort to do that thus far. Doesn't mean he won't. This is a bad guy."
>>>
>>>
>>> **** Durbin > September 30, 1999
>>> "One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is
>>> the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments
>>> regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or
>>> some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Nelson > August 25, 2002
>>> "[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam has chemical and biological
>>> weapons, and I expect that he is trying to develop a nuclear weapon.
>>> So at some point, we might have to act precipitously."
>>>
>>> Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002
>>> "Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is
>>> trying to get nuclear weapons."
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
>>> "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st
>>> Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build
>>> arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles
>>> to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no
>>> more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."
>>>
>>>
>>> Johnny Edwards > February 6, 2003
>>> "The question is whether we're going to allow this man who's been
>>> developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of
>>> mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where --
>>> if we're going to stop him if he invades a country around him -- it'll
>>> cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives."
>>>
>>>
>>> Al Gore > September 23, 2002
>>> "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
>>> weapons throughout his country."
>>>
>>> John Kerry > February 23, 1998
>>> "Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear
>>> that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity
>>> and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability
>>> of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of
>>> terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions
>>> near but not exactly in the Middle East."
>>
>>Oh, come on. It's obvious that George W. Bush /influenced/ all those
>>people
>>to say those things -- even the ones that were two-plus years before he
>>became President. Get real, man.
>>
>
> That's more than the response you'd get from a liberal, they just
> ignore it and go on to their next "fair and balanced" viewpoint.
Brickston, you are a near genius for sure and much more energetic than I can
ever hope to be. Do not be so hard on poor Bill Baka. He is an artist and we
need those types too.
Sornson fancies himself as a gadfly and is hardly ever to be taken
seriously. He is innocuous, unlike some others. I reserve my ammunition for
those who truly pose a threat to Western Civilization.
Mr. Tom Sherman of ARBR is so wrongheaded that it is positively scary. I was
like him in my long lost youth, but now I know better. If there are too many
who think like Tom Sherman, then we are destroyed.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 07:04:46 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>R Brickston wrote:
>>> On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 22:34:31 GMT, "Bill Sornson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> So what leading Democrat
>>>
>>> Take your pick...
>>>
>>>> said those things (sincere beliefs) that would be
>>>> characterized as cooked intelligence (evil lies) if uttered by Bush?
>>
>>
>>> Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002
>>> "It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear
>>> weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist
>>> acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the
>>> united states."
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
>>> "If Saddam rejects peace, and we have to use force, our purpose is
>>> clear: We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
>>> weapons of mass destruction program."
>>>
>>>
>>> Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998
>>> "We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and
>>> the security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998
>>> "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
>>> destruction technology, which is a threat to countries in the region,
>>> and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
>>>
>>>
>>> Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002
>>> "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
>>> developing weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002
>>> "There was unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
>>> aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
>>> weapons within the next five years. We also should remember that we
>>> have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development
>>> of weapons of mass destruction."
>>>
>>>
>>> Joe Biden > August 4, 2002
>>> "[H]e does have the capacity, as all terrorist-related operations do,
>>> of smuggling stuff into the United States and doing something
>>> terrible. That is true. But there's been no connection, hard
>>> connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his willingness or
>>> effort to do that thus far. Doesn't mean he won't. This is a bad guy."
>>>
>>>
>>> **** Durbin > September 30, 1999
>>> "One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is
>>> the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments
>>> regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or
>>> some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."
>>>
>>>
>>> Bill Nelson > August 25, 2002
>>> "[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam has chemical and biological
>>> weapons, and I expect that he is trying to develop a nuclear weapon.
>>> So at some point, we might have to act precipitously."
>>>
>>> Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002
>>> "Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is
>>> trying to get nuclear weapons."
>>>
>>> Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
>>> "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st
>>> Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build
>>> arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles
>>> to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no
>>> more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."
>>>
>>>
>>> Johnny Edwards > February 6, 2003
>>> "The question is whether we're going to allow this man who's been
>>> developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of
>>> mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where --
>>> if we're going to stop him if he invades a country around him -- it'll
>>> cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives."
>>>
>>>
>>> Al Gore > September 23, 2002
>>> "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
>>> weapons throughout his country."
>>>
>>> John Kerry > February 23, 1998
>>> "Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear
>>> that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity
>>> and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability
>>> of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of
>>> terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions
>>> near but not exactly in the Middle East."
>>
>>Oh, come on. It's obvious that George W. Bush /influenced/ all those
>>people
>>to say those things -- even the ones that were two-plus years before he
>>became President. Get real, man.
>>
>
> That's more than the response you'd get from a liberal, they just
> ignore it and go on to their next "fair and balanced" viewpoint.
Brickston, you are a near genius for sure and much more energetic than I can
ever hope to be. Do not be so hard on poor Bill Baka. He is an artist and we
need those types too.
Sornson fancies himself as a gadfly and is hardly ever to be taken
seriously. He is innocuous, unlike some others. I reserve my ammunition for
those who truly pose a threat to Western Civilization.
Mr. Tom Sherman of ARBR is so wrongheaded that it is positively scary. I was
like him in my long lost youth, but now I know better. If there are too many
who think like Tom Sherman, then we are destroyed.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
