Big Disappointment: Polar S720i Heart Rate Monitor

[hhs]

"Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Bill Baka wrote:
>> ...Hell, I don't know if there is a use for it [plutonium] besides
>> bombs....
>
> BICYCLE FRAMES!
>
> --
> Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain
>

I believe Sherman means BICYCLE BOMBS! They are becoming more popular these
days.

 

[Dan Gregory]

di wrote:

>> Dan Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> ..
>> speaking of mental stability, what about your government giving a visa
>> to your country's enemy to come spew his propaganda on american soil???!!
>> from the bbc, september 3:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5309766.stm
>>

Oh no I didn't!!!!

DG

 

[Bill Baka]

M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> The list is only transgressions against Americans.
>
> like if you would give a **** about the rest of the world.
>
Hey,
I do care. I think what the Muslims are doing to the Africans is
outrageous, and equally outrageous that Bush is doing his best to ignore
it. Maybe he is afraid of another Somalia. He sure doesn't have to worry
about getting re-elected, but may be more concerned about getting 'ALL'
the Muslims in the world ****** off even more at us.
It's politics, so who knows what the reason is.
Bill Baka

 

[Bill Baka]

M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> No, I think he probably means this kind of terrorist:
>>
>> — November 1979: Muslim extremists (Iranian variety) seized the U.S.
>> embassy in Iran and held 52 American hostages for 444 days, following
>> Democrat Jimmy Carter's masterful foreign policy granting Islamic
>> fanaticism its first real foothold in the Middle East.
>
> ah! good! i was afraid he was talking about american terrorists, white,
> anglos, good republicans. or worse, the american terrorist state.
> here's a partial list (we can do list too. more at
> http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/)
> but i seriously doubt you'll have the intellectual honesty to step back
> and try to understand.
>
> 1948 ‹ Present American/Israeli State Terrorism of the Palestinian People
> Estimated civilian deaths: 100,000 Palestinian people
>
> 1960s ‹ Present American Support for Colombian State Terrorism of the
> Colombian People
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 67,000 people
>
> 1991 ‹ Present American/British State Terrorism of the Iraqi People
> Estimated total civilian deaths: at least 200,000 people directly from
> the 1991 terror campaign;
> 1,000,000 ‹ 2,000,000 people since then from the combined effects of
> depleted uranium poisoning, polluted water and sanctions
>
> 1992 ‹ Present American/NATO State Terrorism of the Yugoslavian People
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 3000 people from the 1999 terror-bombing
> Weapons of mass-destruction used by U.S.-dominated NATO forces included
> cluster bombs, depleted uranium missiles, fuel-air bombs, napalm, cruise
> missiles and other so-called "smart bombs."
> 250,000 people were killed during the U.S./German-sponsored civil war in
> Bosnia, 1992-1995 and Krajina, 1995.
>
>
> 1960 ‹ Present American Assassination of Patrice Lumumba and Backing of
> State Terrorism of the People of The Congo/Zaire
>
> 1959 ‹ Present American Subversion and State Terrorism of the Cuban
> People
>
>
> 1953 ‹ Present American-backed Genocide of the Guatemalan People
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 200,000 people
>
> 1980 ‹ Present American Terrorism of the El Salvadoran People
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 75,000 people
>
> 1975 ‹ 1999
> American-backed Genocide of the People of East Timor
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 200,000 people
>
>
> 1987 ‹ 1994
> American-supported State Terrorism of the Haitian People
> The U.S. supported the Duvalier family dictatorship for 30 years, then
> opposed the reformist priest, Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Meanwhile, the CIA
> was working intimately with death squads, torturers, and drug
> traffickers.
>
>
> 1993
> American Slaughter of People in Somalia
>
> 1979 ‹ 1992
> American Subversion in Afghanistan
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 1,000,000 people
>
> 1981 ‹ 1990
> American Terrorism of the Nicaraguan People
> Estimated civilian deaths: over 13,000 people
>
> 1989 American Invasion of Panama
> Estimated civilian deaths: several thousand people
>
> etc... etc... etc...
>
Nobody ever said the American government was beyond reproach or anywhere
near perfect. Somalia was a big recent mistake, but that has apparently
made the government paranoid of helping anyone that does not have
something we want, like oil. I don't think there ever will be a perfect
government in this country or any other. Human nature would have to
change, and that takes millenniums.
Bill Baka

 

[Bill Baka]

hhs wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Bill Baka wrote:
>>> ...Hell, I don't know if there is a use for it [plutonium] besides
>>> bombs....
>> BICYCLE FRAMES!
>>
>> --
>> Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain
>>
>
> I believe Sherman means BICYCLE BOMBS! They are becoming more popular these
> days.
>
>
Huh?
Where?
I have seen some bicycles that bombed, but bicycle bombs?????
Bill Baka

 

[M. Bakunin]

In article <XCHKg.15119$%[email protected]>,
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

> and equally outrageous that Bush is doing his best to ignore

he's doing what his handlers tell him to do.
he's ready to start an other war about a word he can't even read and
pronounce: nuclear. which becomes nukelar in his mouth.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

 

[M. Bakunin]

In article <zMHKg.15122$%[email protected]>,
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have seen some bicycles that bombed, but bicycle bombs?????

it's been used many times already. in the 80's in front of a synagogue
in paris. and more recently on august 30 in iraq in front of an army
recruiting center in Hillah (12 dead).
so it's just recycling an old idea.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

 

[Bill Baka]

M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <XCHKg.15119$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> and equally outrageous that Bush is doing his best to ignore
>
> he's doing what his handlers tell him to do.
> he's ready to start an other war about a word he can't even read and
> pronounce: nuclear. which becomes nukelar in his mouth.
>
I agree 100% and handlers reminds me of what is needed with a dumb
animal. I watch his press conferences more for entertainment than the
hope he will actually say something intelligent. His best characteristic
is that he usually has a good comeback when somebody says something
about him that he doesn't like. Years of practice?
Bill Baka

 

[Bill Baka]

M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <zMHKg.15122$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I have seen some bicycles that bombed, but bicycle bombs?????
>
> it's been used many times already. in the 80's in front of a synagogue
> in paris. and more recently on august 30 in iraq in front of an army
> recruiting center in Hillah (12 dead).
> so it's just recycling an old idea.
>
Apparently it never made the American news or was just a one liner to
our news people. I guess a bicycle frame packed to the hilt with TNT
would make one hell of a frag bomb.
Bill Baka

 

[M. Bakunin]

In article <_VHKg.15125$%[email protected]>,
Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:

> Apparently it never made the American news

like so many things. between the media self-imposed censorship, the one
imposed by the government and the lack of interest by the populace, one
seeking information will find more propaganda than information.
now, if morons (like dolan and brickston) could read anything else than
american, they may get educated by reading the foreign press websites. i
guess if they were interested they could read it anyway on the websites
written in english. but that would mean they have a real interest in
finding out what is really going in the world.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

 

[hhs]

"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "n5hsr" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Even though my last name is of French origin, and I did take French in
>
> Who cares?
> No need to apologize. You're not what your ancestors were, lucky you,
> you're just an average american moron.
>
> --

I'm sorry, I arrived on this thread a bit late. From in what country did
say you reside? I suspect you are you British where all the morons are
above average.

 

[R Brickston]

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 15:04:47 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> No, I think he probably means this kind of terrorist:
>>
>> — November 1979: Muslim extremists (Iranian variety) seized the U.S.
>> embassy in Iran and held 52 American hostages for 444 days, following
>> Democrat Jimmy Carter's masterful foreign policy granting Islamic
>> fanaticism its first real foothold in the Middle East.
>
>ah! good! i was afraid he was talking about american terrorists, white,
>anglos, good republicans. or worse, the american terrorist state.
>here's a partial list (we can do list too. more at
>http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/)
>but i seriously doubt you'll have the intellectual honesty to step back
>and try to understand.

Bakuni The Looney, here's some of what your link from the SEP
(Socialist Equality Party) suggests:
-------------------------------

The Socialist Equality Party opposes the capitalist system.

Our party fights for the socialist principle that the economy should
be organized democratically to serve the needs of the working class...

The Socialist Equality Party has been formed for the purpose of
mobilizing the working class to end the political rule of the
financial oligarchy and place into power a democratic government of
the workers, for the workers and, above all, by the workers. The
workers government for which we fight would carry out those radical
economic measures necessary to secure the social needs of the people.
It would subordinate the capitalist market to the interests of society
as a whole.

-------------------------------

This Marxist system has been tried many times and has failed
miserably. The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
capitalistic economy that supports their communist regime which then
in reality always becomes a political entity run by "royalty" who live
a lavish lifestyle while those underneath suufer.

 

[R Brickston]

Bakuni The Loony's post of 7/26/06:

"you are truly brain washed. or just plain stupid. the war in iraq was
justified by doctored intelligence. even republicans with brains
recognized it now. where are the wmd? the "mushroom cloud" and the
rest of the lies? (poor colin powell who ruined what was left of his
reputation with his speech to the u.n.)
iraq a new north korea!? you realy live in a hole. "

This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:

Chuck Schumer > October 10, 2002
"It is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear
weapons, and his present and future potential support for terrorist
acts and organizations that make him a danger to the people of the
united states."

Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998 "If Saddam rejects peace, and we have
to use force, our purpose is clear: We want to seriously diminish the
threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."

Madeleine Albright > February 1, 1998 "We must stop Saddam from ever
again jeopardizing the stability and the security of his neighbors
with weapons of mass destruction."

Nancy Pelosi > December 16, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in
the development of weapons of mass destruction technology, which is a
threat to countries in the region, and he has made a mockery of the
weapons inspection process."

Ted Kennedy > September 27, 2002 "We have known for many years that
Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."

Jay Rockefeller > October 10, 2002 "There was unmistakable evidence
that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons
and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. We
also should remember that we have always underestimated the progress
Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

Joe Biden > August 4, 2002 "[H]e does have the capacity, as all
terrorist-related operations do, of smuggling stuff into the United
States and doing something terrible. That is true. But there's been no
connection, hard connection made yet between he and al-Qaida or his
willingness or effort to do that thus far. Doesn't mean he won't. This
is a bad guy."

**** Durbin > September 30, 1999
"One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is
the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments
regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or
some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."


Bill Nelson > August 25, 2002
"[M]y own personal view is, I think Saddam
has chemical and biological weapons,
and I expect that he is trying to develop
a nuclear weapon. So at some point,
we might have to act precipitously."

Nancy Pelosi > October 10, 2002
"Yes, he has chemical weapons. Yes, he has biological weapons. He is
trying to get nuclear weapons."

Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
"We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st
Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build
arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles
to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no
more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."


Johnny Edwards > February 6, 2003
"The question is whether we're going to allow this man who's been
developing weapons of mass destruction continue to develop weapons of
mass destruction, get nuclear capability and get to the place where --
if we're going to stop him if he invades a country around him -- it'll
cost millions of lives as opposed to thousands of lives."


Al Gore > September 23, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
weapons throughout his country."


John Kerry > February 23, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has already used these weapons and has made it clear
that he has the intent to continue to try, by virtue of his duplicity
and secrecy, to continue to do so. That is a threat to the stability
of the Middle East. It is a threat with respect to the potential of
terrorist activities on a global basis. It is a threat even to regions
near but not exactly in the Middle East."

 

[M. Bakunin]

In article <[email protected]>,
R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:

> This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:

blah blah blah said brickston.

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

 

[R Brickston]

On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 17:04:59 -0500, "hhs" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "n5hsr" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Even though my last name is of French origin, and I did take French in
>>
>> Who cares?
>> No need to apologize. You're not what your ancestors were, lucky you,
>> you're just an average american moron.
>>
>> --
>
>I'm sorry, I arrived on this thread a bit late. From in what country did
>say you reside? I suspect you are you British where all the morons are
>above average.
>
Above average in stupidity.

 

[Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman]

hhs wrote:
> "Johnny Sunset aka Tom Sherman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > R Brickston wrote:
> <snip>
> .................................... they knock
> >> >down 2 towers and 3000+ people.
> >>
> >> So, you approve of the action on Sept. 11?
> >
> > I strongly DISAPPROVE of the actions of September 11, 1973.
> >
>
> So now we wonder if you approve of the al Qaeda attack on the World Trade
> Center on September 11, 2001 based on it was only the Arabs pushing back at
> us or some other leftist we deserved it kind of ****?

I understand the motivation behind the attacks (if it was indeed al
Qaeda or a similar organization), which is more than the people who
claim to be fighting terrorism or the vast majority of the US public
do.

> p.s. (OT)
> Was it your rewriting of history that was responsible for the Chilean coup
> of 1973 page of Wikipedia being locked down?

Maybe it was Henry Kissinger?

--
Tom Sherman - Behind the Cheddar Curtain

 

[R Brickston]

On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:43:49 -0500, "M. Bakunin" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:
>
>blah blah blah said brickston.

What, no comment? Is your brain incapable of any /original/ creative
thought process at all? Because I read through the political lunacy
fomented by the web authors on the link you posted and your spew here
is just a regurgitation of what the /real/ lunatics scribbled.

Your nothing but a wannabe copy-cat venom spitter and when faced with
undeniable facts which put you way out of your very shallow political
depth, you have to beg off.

 

[M. Bakunin]

In article <[email protected]>,
R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:

> The political systems that claim to succeed with it all
> have one thing in common, a strong "black market" underlying
> capitalistic economy

at last, you come up with an honest description of the american system.
goodness, i thought you'll never understand what it means when
halliburton gets the huge contracts without bids, when every week sees
an other politician falling in disgrace about some scam.
you are truly pitiful, vouching for a political system where every
single u.s. senator is a millionaire, where the congress refuses to
raise the minimum wage, but votes an 11,000 dollars raise for the
congressmen, where laws are written by the lobbyists,for their clients
who own the politicians. the only thing that keeps your system together
is greed. the question is: for how long?

--
*** USA, THE MOST TECHNOLOGICALLY ADVANCED PLUTOCRACY ***











Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

 

[di]

"M. Bakunin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> R Brickston <rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@> wrote:
>
>> This is the reply you keep evading, Lefty:
>
> blah blah blah said brickston.
>

Brickston, you just got him, his simple reply shows that.

 

[Bill Baka]

M. Bakunin wrote:
> In article <_VHKg.15125$%[email protected]>,
> Bill Baka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Apparently it never made the American news
>
> like so many things. between the media self-imposed censorship, the one
> imposed by the government and the lack of interest by the populace, one
> seeking information will find more propaganda than information.
> now, if morons (like dolan and brickston) could read anything else than
> american, they may get educated by reading the foreign press websites. i
> guess if they were interested they could read it anyway on the websites
> written in english. but that would mean they have a real interest in
> finding out what is really going in the world.
>
This is why I have shortwave radios that glow in the dark. I get the
news directly from the country that is broadcasting and it is definitely
not always in praise of the (semi) United States. I don't know if the
CIA or whoever can block Internet access to sites they don't like, but I
wouldn't put it past them. In the cold war days the Soviets used to
broadcast hash noise at about a million watts to cover stations they
didn't like. It was like tuning into a buzz saw. If the US starts doing
that then I know the **** is going to hit the fan.
Bill Baka