Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Big shoe update

Started by Email address hidden · · Last activity · 4 posts · 324 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
27 April 2008
Last activity
30 April 2008
Original author
Email address hidden
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
324
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Hi All,

    My home-made shoe project is on hold for a while. The lexan I ordered
    turned out to be quite heavy, so I plan on making a plywood prototype
    first. But since I am supposed to be using carpentry tools to finish
    the house, and not monkey with bike suff, I punked out and ordered
    some Northwave Vertigo shoes size 50.

    They are quite a bit longer than the size 50 Diadora Gekos I have, and
    WAY bigger than the useless Sidi 50's I got off eBay. They have an
    internal hard sole that is wider than the external plastic sole. They
    seem to be made for people with long toes. The cuve of the sole fits
    well, and everywhere else, but the toe-box is quite long.

    Two complaints, which may be minor and only apparent because I am not
    yet used to them:

    1. The cleat holes are too far forward, and too far outboard. I have
    to have the cleats all the way back to get acceptable fore-aft foot
    placement, and all the way to the side to have enough clearance not to
    be too close to the cranks. This also makes it impossible to get the
    toe-out I want without hitting the big plastic heel-cups on the
    chainstays. When it gets warmer, I can adjust for less crank clearance
    as I won't need shoe-covers, and then I can toe-out a bit more.

    2. The straps are attached to pleather that leads rearward in a swoopy
    way that looks cool, but when you pull the straps tight, it wrinkles
    the pleather creating pressure spots. It would be better to have more
    direct angle pulling toward the sole.

    Joseph

  2. Clothing for large folks is rife with these sorts of problems.
    Manufacturers often just scale things up, not noticing that proportions
    may be different in larger people than more average sized people.

    I'm only 6'4"- tall but not abnormally so. There's a lot of guys who
    are my height, at least here in Minnesota I'd say I am at the tall end
    of the average range rather than being outside the average range. I am
    relatively lanky at 215 lbs, a bit over the top end of my ideal body
    weight range but nowhere near obese. Built more like a track rider than
    a roadie. I wear a 45L suit.

    But jeez, try to buy a shirt! I need a 17 neck - 36 sleeve dress shirt,
    but these invariably are proportioned for someone who would fit a 50L
    suit. Yikes! Cycling clothes, on the other hand, are almost always
    proportioned for whippets which I am not.

    I wear size 48 shoes (12 UK, 13 US). My feet are average width, but
    finding a pair of cycling shoes that fits has been a challenge for
    years. The best fit I have found has been with Lake shoes. Similarly
    sized friends have found Shimano shoes to fit well; I don't know who
    makes those for Shimano.

    Glad you hear you have found something that works at least somewhat
    better for you. I wonder if the cleat slots can be extended backwards a
    bit to give you more adjustability without weakening the sole.

  3. Tim McNamara said:

    Clothing for large folks is rife with these sorts of problems.  
    Manufacturers often just scale things up, not noticing that proportions
    may be different in larger people than more average sized people.

    I'm only 6'4"- tall but not abnormally so.  There's a lot of guys who
    are my height, at least here in Minnesota I'd say I am at the tall end
    of the average range rather than being outside the average range.  I am
    relatively lanky at 215 lbs, a bit over the top end of my ideal body
    weight range but nowhere near obese.  Built more like a track rider than
    a roadie.  I wear a 45L suit.

    Sounds like we have a similar build. I'm 6'3" and comfortably padded
    at 225 or so. I'm working my way down to my fighting weight of 205.
    Around 210 now. I'd probably be a track rider too if I weren't 700km
    from the nearest velodrome...

    Quoted message said:

    But jeez, try to buy a shirt!  I need a 17 neck - 36 sleeve dress shirt,
    but these invariably are proportioned for someone who would fit a 50L
    suit.  Yikes!  Cycling clothes, on the other hand, are almost always
    proportioned for whippets which I am not.

    Shirts are hopeless. They are usually huge in the waist, so it looks
    like I'm wearing a tent. Cycling clothes aren't so difficult. Most
    Italian clothes fit pretty good with a slimmer waist than American
    clothes. I have a few "club fit" American jerseys from Voler and
    Nashbar, etc and they are serioulsy pear shaped. Same with shorts.

    Quoted message said:

    I wear size 48 shoes (12 UK, 13 US).  My feet are average width, but
    finding a pair of cycling shoes that fits has been a challenge for
    years.  The best fit I have found has been with Lake shoes.  Similarly
    sized friends have found Shimano shoes to fit well; I don't know who
    makes those for Shimano.

    I was undecided between trying Lake and trying the Northwave ones.
    Everything has to be ordered, so I chose Northwave because it was
    easier. I might still go for some Lake ones if these don't work out. I
    like my Diadora ok, but they are a bit worn and I have been worried
    about losing/breaking them and being hosed for weeks and missing rides
    and races, so I decided to get an additional pair of shoes.

    Quoted message said:

    Glad you hear you have found something that works at least somewhat
    better for you.  I wonder if the cleat slots can be extended backwards a
    bit to give you more adjustability without weakening the sole.

    Doesn't look good. But if I replace the wide head bolts that came with
    the cleats, I should be able to get a few more mm's. I also have a new
    bike in the works that has a slimmer chainstay arrangement that my
    present bike which should help.

    Joseph

  4. Tim McNamara said:
    Quoted message said:

    I wear size 48 shoes (12 UK, 13 US). My feet are average width, but


    finding a pair of cycling shoes that fits has been a challenge for
    years. The best fit I have found has been with Lake shoes. Similarly
    sized friends have found Shimano shoes to fit well; I don't know who
    makes those for Shimano.

    In my experience, Shimano shoes tend to run a bit smaller than others,
    and always seem to stop at size 48.

    --
    Work and recreation are not often effected at the same time.
    One using a bicycle in business makes an exception to the rule.
    - Dr. Edgar H. Earl, Rochester. (~1892)

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.