"Chris" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<
[email protected]>...
<snip>
>
> My "proprietary parts" argument, I'll agree, doesn't make much sense when you consider fork parts
> like stanchions and whatever-kind-of-exclusive-damping goodies. But as some parts are propritary
> in nature (else all designs are identical) the good folks at RockShox made things much too
> difficult.
The brake stud is different because the slider is different. Notice that the part number for the
(48131) carries across to forks with similar sliders ie. Judy. For that matter Rock shox has been
using an M8 stud since 1997 (when it changed it's slider design), and small parts such as the brake
stud kit are available from BTI.
> Brake studs come in a standard size that everyone else uses;
Sure M6 studs are common, but not all M6 studs are the same. Would you repalce an Answer 41396 stud
with a White Brothers 3665?
> that's why your LBS stocks one size, and why they (here I mean "we") couldn't order the RS sized
> studs from anywhere but RS.
You need to look around more, BTI and others carry M8 studs. Just for information ... the RS-48131 &
RS-52261 studs are interchangable.
My LBS carries some small parts from RS-1's and XC-300's through Marathons.
> That's where the Cannondale metaphor carries - obviously some parts are unique, but where a widely
> accepted standard is applicable, it should be applied.
What is a widely accepted standard in the bicycle industry? Hasn't this been done before? Bicycle
industry "standards" change from year to year.
>
> And yes RS is part of SRAM now. I was making a funny.
Actually, RS has been part of SRAM for quite a while, and had undergone several managment changes
before being boutght out.
I was making the point that SRAM has just as many, if not more "proprietary parts" in its lines than
any other bicycle industry manufacturer. They are possibly the one company in the industry that our
shines Cannonwhale in the wierd factor.
Reco