M
Marc
Guest
SMH <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm still trying to work out how bike bell bills get on a legislative agenda when they can't even
> pass a law to ban mobile phone use while driving.
Because having/not having a bell, is a nice easy to police, absolute offence. Either someone has it
or they havent got it and even plod can spot that, if they can be bothered. Useing, as opposed to
owning or holding a mobile phone, or something that looks like a mobile phone opens a huge can of
worms , will take lots of parlimentary time, lots of police time to investigate prosecute etc... and
no one wants to be seen to be hurting Mr. Mrs average. The bell legislation on the other hand only
affects a "minority" and will if/when it gets passed be almost universally ignored/pais lip service
to, and will lay there forgotten until plod want's to add the icing on the cake, or an insurance
company wants a bit of wriggle room.
> I'm still trying to work out how bike bell bills get on a legislative agenda when they can't even
> pass a law to ban mobile phone use while driving.
Because having/not having a bell, is a nice easy to police, absolute offence. Either someone has it
or they havent got it and even plod can spot that, if they can be bothered. Useing, as opposed to
owning or holding a mobile phone, or something that looks like a mobile phone opens a huge can of
worms , will take lots of parlimentary time, lots of police time to investigate prosecute etc... and
no one wants to be seen to be hurting Mr. Mrs average. The bell legislation on the other hand only
affects a "minority" and will if/when it gets passed be almost universally ignored/pais lip service
to, and will lay there forgotten until plod want's to add the icing on the cake, or an insurance
company wants a bit of wriggle room.