T
Tom Nakashima
Guest
My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
-tom
of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
-tom
D
David Kerber
Guest
In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
How was the data collected? A lot of runners count each foot impact, so
they come up with a number exactly twice what a cyclist at the same
cadence would register.
Going down a hill and not putting any pressure on the pedals, it
probably is possible for some people to hit 172. Mark says he can hit
200 on a stationary bike. I can only hit about 145 on the trainer, but
my bike has rather long crank arms. I suppose a top trackie might even
make some significant power at that cadence, but I doubt any normal
human would.
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
says...
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
How was the data collected? A lot of runners count each foot impact, so
they come up with a number exactly twice what a cyclist at the same
cadence would register.
Going down a hill and not putting any pressure on the pedals, it
probably is possible for some people to hit 172. Mark says he can hit
200 on a stationary bike. I can only hit about 145 on the trainer, but
my bike has rather long crank arms. I suppose a top trackie might even
make some significant power at that cadence, but I doubt any normal
human would.
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
C
crystal_tears_
Guest
Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
for road biking.
--
ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
for road biking.
--
T
Thaimaan Norppa
Guest
N
Nick Payne
Guest
Tom Nakashima wrote:
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
Yes. Max short term power is actually developed at a pretty high
cadence. Track sprinters regularly hit 160rpm in a sprint (70kph in a
52-15, for example). If you don't actually have to develop power, higher
cadences are possible. I've seen 203 on the display of a cadence speedo
when just trying for max rpm down a hill.
Nick
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a cadence
> of 172 rpm. Is that possible?
Yes. Max short term power is actually developed at a pretty high
cadence. Track sprinters regularly hit 160rpm in a sprint (70kph in a
52-15, for example). If you don't actually have to develop power, higher
cadences are possible. I've seen 203 on the display of a cadence speedo
when just trying for max rpm down a hill.
Nick
E
Evan Evans
Guest
R
Rick Onanian
Guest
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:01:16 GMT, crystal_tears_
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
>ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
>for road biking.
On almost every ride, I apply power past 110 rpm in my highest gear,
52x11 on 700x23c tires. I've got a good aerobelly and lots of hills.
--
Rick Onanian
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
>ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
>for road biking.
On almost every ride, I apply power past 110 rpm in my highest gear,
52x11 on 700x23c tires. I've got a good aerobelly and lots of hills.
--
Rick Onanian
A
armchair_spacem
Guest
Tom Nakashima wrote:
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a
> cadence of 172 rpm. Is that possible? -tom
I don't want to rain on your buddy's parade but is he using a cordless
computer? There are a couple of spots on one of my regular rides where
RF interference plays up with my Polar S710. This morning it tells me
I'm spinning at 80kmh at a cadence of 160 at 120% of max heart rate.
Unless I slipped into some alternate universe for that minute or two I'm
pretty sure it's interference giving me those numbers.
--
> My friend sent me over his training data. The chart says he has a
> cadence of 172 rpm. Is that possible? -tom
I don't want to rain on your buddy's parade but is he using a cordless
computer? There are a couple of spots on one of my regular rides where
RF interference plays up with my Polar S710. This morning it tells me
I'm spinning at 80kmh at a cadence of 160 at 120% of max heart rate.
Unless I slipped into some alternate universe for that minute or two I'm
pretty sure it's interference giving me those numbers.
--
B
Bestest Handsander
Guest
"crystal_tears_" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
> ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
> for road biking.
>
For mere mortals perhaps, but don't Millar and Armstrong maintain 130 or so
during their time trials?
news:[email protected]...
> Don't know if it's possible or not but if so sounds totally
> ridiculous to me. There's no need to ever go above a 110 rpm cadence
> for road biking.
>
For mere mortals perhaps, but don't Millar and Armstrong maintain 130 or so
during their time trials?
