General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Book Review: Darwin and Design (Michael Ruse)

Started by Anthony Campbel · · Last activity · 2 posts · 533 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Anthony Campbel
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
533
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. An HTML version of this review is available at:
    acampbell.org.ukbookreviews

    Over 200 other reviews of books on acupuncture, biography, biology, brain and mind, cosmology,
    cycling, death and dying, evolution, fiction, history, history of science, medicine, parapsychology,
    palaeontology, philology, philosophy, philosophy of science, psychology, religion, science, and
    travel may be found at this site.
    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    Michael Ruse

    DARWIN AND DESIGN

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    -----------------------------------------------------------
    Book review by Anthony Campbell. Copyright © Anthony Campbell (2003).
    -----------------------------------------------------------

    Although there are still people today, particularly in the USA, who adhere to the Biblical account
    of special creation of the different species, most educated people accept that evolution has
    occurred. That is, they accept that the animals and plants we see about us have come into being by a
    process of progressive modification of earlier forms. The really contentious claim put forward by
    Darwin, however, was that this has happened without any underlying plan. Instead of a plan,
    evolution, according to Darwin and his successors, has occurred because essentially random
    variations have been acted on by natural selection. This theory seems to many to leave no room for
    any Divine purpose.

    This is the question that Ruse tackles in his new book. Although he touches fairly briefly on pre-
    Darwinian thought, starting with classical Greece, he naturally concentrates mainly on the period
    after the mid-nineteenth century. Darwin, he says, planted a bomb under Victorian teleology, and
    although argument about the role of design in evolution continued and is still alive today, the
    terms of the debate were altered for ever.

    Darwin's central idea of natural selection was not widely accepted in the decades following
    publication of Tne Origin , and even Darwin's most vigorous defender, TH Huxley, did not emphasize
    it. Not until the 1930s did interest in natural selection revive. Partly this was due to the belated
    discovery of Mendelian genetics, and partly it was due to the work of the statistician Ronald
    Fisher. Theodore Dobzhanski and Ernst Mayr among others built on these developments and brought
    about a revival of interest in natural selection - neo-darwinism.

    For some modern Darwinists, notably Richard Dawkins, the clear implication of Darwinism is that
    there is no place for purpose or direction in evolution. Progressive theologians, however, insist
    that there is no conflict between Darwinism and theism, and this is the question that Ruse takes up
    in his concluding chapters. He gives natural theology a fair summing up but concludes that it cannot
    ultimately work. "The Darwinian revolution is over, and Darwin won." We must "recognize that Dawkins
    is right, that Darwinism is a major challenge to relgious belief and that you cannot simply pretend
    that nothing very much has happened."

    Perhaps rather surprisingly, however, Ruse continues to argue for what he calls a theology of nature
    (as opposed to a natural theology). This seems to rely on an aesthetic response to nature -- a near-
    mystical appreciation of the beauty of the living world. He quotes a remark once made to him by
    Ernst Mayr: "People forget that it is possible to be intensely religious in the entire absence of
    theological belief." This attitude would be quite at home in Buddhism but I think that many
    Christians would find it too impersonal.

    This is a thoughtful and quite detailed discussion of the design question in evolution. As in his
    earlier book, Ruse is particularly good on the background of the people who figure in his narrative
    of events. I had not known previously that Fisher was a committed Christian as well as a "fanatical
    Darwinian", who thought of adaptation as representative of God's creative intent.

    Related review: The Darwinian Revolution (Michael Ruse)

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    %T DARWIN AND DESIGN %S Does evolution have a purpose? %A Michael Ruse %I Harvard University
    Press %C Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England %D 2003 %G ISBN 0-674-01023-X %P x + 371 pp
    %K Evolution

    --
    Using Linux GNU/Debian - Windows-free zone acampbell.org.ukacampbell.org.uk (book reviews and articles)
    Email: replace "www." with "ac@"

  2. << Instead of a plan, evolution, according to Darwin and his successors, has occurred because
    essentially random variations have been acted on by natural selection. This theory seems to many to
    leave no room for any Divine purpose.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Or much logic either. If it was random chance there wouldn't be the trend toward complexity. There
    would be half a trend toward complexity and half a trend away from it. (and I don't mean just the
    simpler parasites)

    IMO if you look at life as evolved forms of energy moderators - each evolved step as a way to better
    adept to the first heat cycle environment and then to better fit any evolved variation in the
    environment, then it makes more sense.

    Randomness and chance go nowhere - life goes in the direction that better adapts itself to the
    environment (which in its first form was a thermal heat cycle that life chem. was able to 1.
    Survive, 2. Form novel ways of improving those survival chances through energy moderation with
    modification through descent..

    Tom Hendricks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.