P
Peter Fox
Guest
Pete Biggs wrote:
> Peter Fox wrote:
>> Err why has nobody commented on the illogicality?
>> If it is 'sensible' [No it bloody well isn't it's UNSAFE' to let
>> cycles through on red then the /same logic must apply to cars/.
>
> Rubbish.
>
> Bikes are so much narrower that there are many junctions on roads with wide
> carriageways and wide lanes when a bike could safely and conveniently turn
> left when a car could not.
Oh dear, it appears you haven't got a clue about the dynamics of traffic
and how road space gets used in real time.
--
Peter Fox
Beer, dancing, cycling and lots more at www.eminent.demon.co.uk
> Peter Fox wrote:
>> Err why has nobody commented on the illogicality?
>> If it is 'sensible' [No it bloody well isn't it's UNSAFE' to let
>> cycles through on red then the /same logic must apply to cars/.
>
> Rubbish.
>
> Bikes are so much narrower that there are many junctions on roads with wide
> carriageways and wide lanes when a bike could safely and conveniently turn
> left when a car could not.
Oh dear, it appears you haven't got a clue about the dynamics of traffic
and how road space gets used in real time.
--
Peter Fox
Beer, dancing, cycling and lots more at www.eminent.demon.co.uk