Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Bottom Bracket Woes

Started by Rod · · Last activity · 5 posts · 670 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 May 2007
Last activity
29 May 2007
Original author
Rod
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
670
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. This is a bit long, apologies but I have no other way to explain it,
    and hopefully someone can help me out with this vexing issue.

    Finally got a Matt Chester frame (love it), which has a BB issue I
    need to address.

    The original owner had a Schlumpf crank installed which required
    chamfering the BB shell. In doing so, the BB threads were cross
    threaded. Although they were chased, the threads are still not
    perfect, and the Phil BB I have in there creaks pretty badly because
    the thread interface is somewhat loose after the chasing, plus it's a
    68mm BB which doesn't use all the threads in the Phil lockring anyway,
    and chamfering it takes away another 1.5mm or so of threads in the
    BB. I've tried loctite, teflon tape, etc, with no joy.
    There was also a Shimano BB in there when I got it with plenty of
    thread engagement and teflon tape, that creaked also.

    The guy I got the frame from also had a Mavic 616 BB (the one that
    uses the 45 degree chamfer and lockrings/external threads on the BB to
    secure it) he included. It has a 114mm spindle, which sounded good
    since I use a 113mm spindle with Sugino XD (110bcd triple) cranks and
    it gives me a perfect chainline (52mm, I believe) with the Phil KISS-
    Off double fixed hubs I use.

    Problem is that the BB is ISO, and the cranks are JIS, so can't use
    that combo.

    Question 1:

    Is there another, ISO, crank (TA or Campy triple, maybe, or...?) that
    will give the same chainline with a 114mm spindle, using the outer
    ring?

    Question 2:

    If not, what spindle length would it take, with what crank, to get the
    52mm chainline using the outer ring position?

    Anyway, if you've made it this far I appreciate it, and hope you can
    help.

    Thanks,
    Rod

  2. Rod said:

    This is a bit long, apologies but I have no other way to explain it,
    and hopefully someone can help me out with this vexing issue.

    Finally got a Matt Chester frame (love it), which has a BB issue I
    need to address.

    The original owner had a Schlumpf crank installed which required
    chamfering the BB shell. In doing so, the BB threads were cross
    threaded. Although they were chased, the threads are still not
    perfect, and the Phil BB I have in there creaks pretty badly because
    the thread interface is somewhat loose after the chasing, plus it's a
    68mm BB which doesn't use all the threads in the Phil lockring anyway,
    and chamfering it takes away another 1.5mm or so of threads in the
    BB. I've tried loctite, teflon tape, etc, with no joy.
    There was also a Shimano BB in there when I got it with plenty of
    thread engagement and teflon tape, that creaked also.

    The guy I got the frame from also had a Mavic 616 BB (the one that
    uses the 45 degree chamfer and lockrings/external threads on the BB to
    secure it) he included. It has a 114mm spindle, which sounded good
    since I use a 113mm spindle with Sugino XD (110bcd triple) cranks and
    it gives me a perfect chainline (52mm, I believe) with the Phil KISS-
    Off double fixed hubs I use.

    Problem is that the BB is ISO, and the cranks are JIS, so can't use
    that combo.

    Sheldon has an article on this topic:

    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/bbtaper.html

    According to that, your 114mm ISO spindle would act like a 110.5mm
    spindle with a JIS crank. I'm not familiar with your other components
    (i.e. the Phil hubs), but maybe you could adjust away a mm or two,
    leaving a very good chainline.

    --
    Dave
    dvt at psu dot edu

  3. if red does not work then try one of these, remembering surface prep
    is important and that one metal surface is to be ferrous but not
    ferrous stainless. if neither surface is ferrous then ask locktite for
    a compound carrying ferrous material:

    http://www.loctite.com/int_henkel/loctite_us/index.cfm?&pageid=130&layout=1

  4. Quoted post said:

    if red does not work then try one of these, remembering surface prep
    is important and that one metal surface is to be ferrous but not
    ferrous stainless. if neither surface is ferrous then ask locktite for
    a compound carrying ferrous material:

    http://www.loctite.com/int_henkel/loctite_us/index.cfm?&pageid=130&la...

    hyperlink failure! search the above list for "retaining" and click

  5. Quoted post said:
    Quoted post said:

    if red does not work then try one of these, remembering surface prep
    is important and that one metal surface is to be ferrous but not
    ferrous stainless. if neither surface is ferrous then ask locktite for
    a compound carrying ferrous material:

    Quoted message said:

    http://www.loctite.com/int_henkel/loctite_us/index.cfm?&pageid=130&la...

    hyperlink failure! search the above list for "retaining" and click

    sorry about this being piecemeal but I'm cooking dinner-
    is the spindle tapered? a primary service problem containing the words
    "creak creak" occurs at the tapered spindle and crank with the crank
    loosening: all creaking noises go to the loose crank first./ grab the
    end, pull and push it inboard/outboard. see: 'beer can shim datakoll'
    in tech archives

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.