davidbod said:Hopefully whatever the final outcome is the officials will get it right and there won't be any lingering doubts one way or the other. It is curious though that it is taking such a long time, and I too agree that there must be something that has raised doubt enough to keep the hearing open. A month seems like a long time when your talking about what should be concrete scientific results.
Absolutely agree. And I think that the process has been so damn contaminated now that no one will ever know one way or the other. Personally, I'm willing to give Hamilton the benefit of the doubt, based soley on personal ethics considerations, until someone can logically and soundly convince me of his guilt based on evidentuary considerations. Note: this is not an attempt to start up another flame war. Others are entitled to their diverse opinions on the matter.
I agree that the length of time speaks to the fact that this is NOT an easy test to interpret. The Olympic doping people couldn't make up their mind ...first he's clean, freeze the B sample; ooooooops, another inspector says it's a mixed population, let's put a big asterik next to the gold medal that will last forever.
Phonak hired 5 experts to review the matter, two thought the test was right; two thought there were problems with, the 5th guy couldn't make up his mind. Might be a clue that this is a problem child test. Works brilliantly when there is no false positive consequences but when you attach sanctions for a positive to a test where no one has determined the false positive rate...well, it just plain stinks.