"P e t e F a g e r l i n" <[email protected]
> "Michael Paul" <[email protected]
> | gotta ask, at the 2:20 mark, were you riding (and if so where did you mount the camera, because
> | the angle looked much lower) or were you running behind the bike?
Not only was the angle different, the path of the camera's perspective didn't follow the trail the
way a bike would. Unless the rider could make the bike fly without the picture suffering. I was
thinking there was something fishy going on there.
Pete, did you get some new hardware? The picture quality seemed more crisp than past videos. Perhaps
it was just that I watched it on an LCD display...
Tom Purvis - http://www.arkansasvalley.net/tpurvis/