Hi Everyone! I'm new to the forum and just getting into road cycling. I have stopped by 4 or 5 LBSs and test ridden a number of different bikes from different manufacturers. I think at this point I have narrowed is down to 2 top contenders based on bike specs and comfort as well as LBS customer service. I am currently trying to decide between the 2012 Cannondale CAAD8 105 and the 2013 Trek Madone 2.1 C.
http://www.cannondale.com/2012-caad8-5-105-19853
http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/road/sport/madone_2_series/madone_2_1/#/us/en/model/details?url=us/en/bikes/road/sport/madone_2_series/madone_2_1
It appears to me (being the new guy that I am), that the bikes stack up pretty well technically with both having ALU frames with Shimano 105 shifters and front/rear derailleurs. The big difference appears to be the crank (FSA Gossamer, BB30, 50/34 for the Cannondale versus Shimano R565, 50/34 compact on the Trek) and the cassette (Shimano Tiagra 4600, 12-28 on the Cannondale versus Shimano Tiagra 12-30 on the Trek). There is also a difference in the hubs and rims.
Besides the specs, the Cannondale is going for $1250 (on sale from $1450) and the LBS is offering free tune ups for as long as I own the bike plus 10% off everything in the store (I also believe this is good as long as I own the bike). The Trek is going for $1430 and the LBS is offering free tune ups for a year and 10% off anything I purchase at the time I purchase the bike.
For the money (an assuming they are both comfortable, which appears to be the case after a rough fitting and a 5 minute test ride on each), is there any reason not to go with the Cannondale? I saw online that there were some problems with the FSA Gossamer crank on the Cannondales, but I believe that was corrected.
Also, I noticed that the LBS with the Cannondale has a 2012 CAAD10 105 listed at $1670, which assuming it will also be discounted like the CAAD8, would that be a worthwhile step?
http://www.rideonbicycles.net/product/12cannondale-caad10-5-compact-130041-1.htm
Any advice on which way to go would be appreciated.
http://www.cannondale.com/2012-caad8-5-105-19853
http://www.trekbikes.com/us/en/bikes/road/sport/madone_2_series/madone_2_1/#/us/en/model/details?url=us/en/bikes/road/sport/madone_2_series/madone_2_1
It appears to me (being the new guy that I am), that the bikes stack up pretty well technically with both having ALU frames with Shimano 105 shifters and front/rear derailleurs. The big difference appears to be the crank (FSA Gossamer, BB30, 50/34 for the Cannondale versus Shimano R565, 50/34 compact on the Trek) and the cassette (Shimano Tiagra 4600, 12-28 on the Cannondale versus Shimano Tiagra 12-30 on the Trek). There is also a difference in the hubs and rims.
Besides the specs, the Cannondale is going for $1250 (on sale from $1450) and the LBS is offering free tune ups for as long as I own the bike plus 10% off everything in the store (I also believe this is good as long as I own the bike). The Trek is going for $1430 and the LBS is offering free tune ups for a year and 10% off anything I purchase at the time I purchase the bike.
For the money (an assuming they are both comfortable, which appears to be the case after a rough fitting and a 5 minute test ride on each), is there any reason not to go with the Cannondale? I saw online that there were some problems with the FSA Gossamer crank on the Cannondales, but I believe that was corrected.
Also, I noticed that the LBS with the Cannondale has a 2012 CAAD10 105 listed at $1670, which assuming it will also be discounted like the CAAD8, would that be a worthwhile step?
http://www.rideonbicycles.net/product/12cannondale-caad10-5-compact-130041-1.htm
Any advice on which way to go would be appreciated.