C
Chad Waldman
Guest
I just bought my first computer (Ascent Delta V) and I am confused on
how to calibrate it for my tires. I am riding a mtn bike with slick
tires (26 x 1.25).
The chart in the instructions does not include this tire size. I have
read other web sites to figure out what to enter in my computer (which
appears to take circumference in mm) however the numbers given on my
chart (and my friend's, who has a Bell) differs from the numbers given
on web sites and my other friend's computer (which is a Cateye). All
appear to use circumference in mm.
Example: Take the 26 x 1.5 tire size. I have listed on my chart: ATB 26
x 1.5 = 2030.
On http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cyclecomputer_calibration.html, it lists
for a 26 x 1.5, 1985. Why are they so far off? This concerns me.
Sheldon's site's chart also seems inaccurate. For example, for the 26 x
1.5 size tire, Group A (which is listed as circumference in inches)
lists 77.71in and for Group F (circumference in mm) lists 1985mm. Last
time I checked however, 77.71in = 1974 mm. Why the discrepancy?
After measuring and trying the rolling test to the best of my ability, I
got roughly 1975mm. On Sheldon's site for a 26 x 1.25 size tire, he
lists 77.44 in = 1967mm, or he lists (in Group F) 1953mm.
What should I enter? How much do these numbers make a difference in the
great scheme of things? I usually ride between 30 and 50 miles at a
time. How much could I possibly expect to be off if I am off by say
20mm?
Thanks,
Chad
how to calibrate it for my tires. I am riding a mtn bike with slick
tires (26 x 1.25).
The chart in the instructions does not include this tire size. I have
read other web sites to figure out what to enter in my computer (which
appears to take circumference in mm) however the numbers given on my
chart (and my friend's, who has a Bell) differs from the numbers given
on web sites and my other friend's computer (which is a Cateye). All
appear to use circumference in mm.
Example: Take the 26 x 1.5 tire size. I have listed on my chart: ATB 26
x 1.5 = 2030.
On http://www.sheldonbrown.com/cyclecomputer_calibration.html, it lists
for a 26 x 1.5, 1985. Why are they so far off? This concerns me.
Sheldon's site's chart also seems inaccurate. For example, for the 26 x
1.5 size tire, Group A (which is listed as circumference in inches)
lists 77.71in and for Group F (circumference in mm) lists 1985mm. Last
time I checked however, 77.71in = 1974 mm. Why the discrepancy?
After measuring and trying the rolling test to the best of my ability, I
got roughly 1975mm. On Sheldon's site for a 26 x 1.25 size tire, he
lists 77.44 in = 1967mm, or he lists (in Group F) 1953mm.
What should I enter? How much do these numbers make a difference in the
great scheme of things? I usually ride between 30 and 50 miles at a
time. How much could I possibly expect to be off if I am off by say
20mm?
Thanks,
Chad