T
D
Don Whybrow
Guest
Tony Raven wrote:
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-month/index.htm
Interesting that after the end of the cycle route, there is a sign
warning motorists of the presence of cyclists on the road.
--
Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
After things go from bad to worse, the cycle will repeat itself.
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/pete.meg/wcc/facility-of-the-month/index.htm
Interesting that after the end of the cycle route, there is a sign
warning motorists of the presence of cyclists on the road.
--
Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
After things go from bad to worse, the cycle will repeat itself.
P
Paul Boyd
Guest
On 26/07/2007 18:31, Don Whybrow said,
> Interesting that after the end of the cycle route, there is a sign
> warning motorists of the presence of cyclists on the road.
Ah - but that's because cyclists are on the road because the bit of
tarmac they were on has magically transformed itself from cyclepath to
road. Unless of course they took the "Cyclists dismount" sign as an
instruction rather than an observation, in which case the sign should be
warning motorists of pedestrians on the road and not cyclists.
Or is that what you meant?
--
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/
> Interesting that after the end of the cycle route, there is a sign
> warning motorists of the presence of cyclists on the road.
Ah - but that's because cyclists are on the road because the bit of
tarmac they were on has magically transformed itself from cyclepath to
road. Unless of course they took the "Cyclists dismount" sign as an
instruction rather than an observation, in which case the sign should be
warning motorists of pedestrians on the road and not cyclists.
Or is that what you meant?
--
Paul Boyd
http://www.paul-boyd.co.uk/
D
Don Whybrow
Guest
Paul Boyd wrote:
>
> Unless of course they took the "Cyclists dismount" sign as an
> instruction rather than an observation, in which case the sign should be
> warning motorists of pedestrians on the road and not cyclists.
>
> Or is that what you meant?
Yes, exactly!
--
Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
If you're happy and you know it, clunk your chains.
>
> Unless of course they took the "Cyclists dismount" sign as an
> instruction rather than an observation, in which case the sign should be
> warning motorists of pedestrians on the road and not cyclists.
>
> Or is that what you meant?
Yes, exactly!
--
Don Whybrow
Sequi Bonum Non Time
If you're happy and you know it, clunk your chains.
