Campy is good, but they all have their positives. For SRAM it is definitely the lever shape, ingenious positioning system, but their shifting isn't a 'wow' change. It's in-between the feel of Shimano and Campy. One thing though, the derailleur tension spring must be extremely tight because it throws the chain onto the next cog. Very American style. Campy, if it were French, would be a case of shunning the chain to the side because of cultural differences hence making it infeerior, though its Italian, so I can't comment. All I know is the chain ends up leaping across the cogs, while Shimano is a gentle glide (worst feeling if its not adjusted). Dunno what you may like, but Campy and Shimano are both lacking in the ergonomics stakes.
And Campy have a much better crank design. If they made an alloy record UT, I'd be on it. Shimano cranks are a performance first, but looks second. SRAM just make **** cranks.
And for reference, a Campy Chorus UT crankset....without BB....weighs 722g. For a carbon crankset of that price, thats pretty heavy. With cups that makes it about the same weight as ultegra (maybe a little bit lighter...the Chorus was including plastic spindle protectors)