On 2006-03-04, TimC (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
> On 2006-03-04, DaveB (aka Bruce)
> was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea:
>> 531Aussie wrote:
>>> How is it different to the rest of Cycling Forums?
>>>
>>> Are the Usenet people seeing something different to what I'm seeing?
>>>
>>> Why doesn't everyone just register like so me they don't see those
>>> crappy-looking >>>> >>> .>>> quotations?
>>
>> I'll leave this one to you Tim.
....
> People use USENET so that they can draw colourful ascii art, because
> slrn can colorise things based on how many levels of ">>>" you have.
Oh, and the interface to a.b is exactly the same as the interface to
my other 8 subscribed groups, and I don't have to go remembering 8
different passwords and login procedures to all these forums, and
USENET was actually explicitly designed by talented people who thought
and discussed the problem at hand -- that of mass non-realtime
discussion groups. There were standards designed, and generally,
people try to stick to them. You aren't at the whim of some random
guy who designed some website forum software thingy, and what changes
he wants to make.
It has a proper discussion tree, and you can go straight to your
unread messages. You can score (I score positively, replies direct to
myself, up to replies to replies to replies to replies to myself, so
that I can take part in discussions I have taken part in recently,
before reading the rest of the groups; also, certain people get read
before other people) or killfile with complete automated ease.
When it isn't working, it typically isn't working for only a single
person at a time, and even then, sometimes you get messages trickling
in. You don't have a website or database going down being much of an
issue.
And finally. Retro is good. Seriously, I am on a bunch of mailing
lists as well, full of techy linuxy types, and I don't understand why
we use mailing lists instead of newsgroups. Newsgroups were designed
for mass discussions of geographically separated people, email was
designed for small discussions.
--
TimC
A Chemist who falls in acid is absorbed in work.