Hello,
I been thinking about a Trek 5200 but have been doing some research on carbon frames and am of the understanding that they do not last. As evidence. . .
Carbon Fiber
Pro: Light, strong, and easily tailored to achieve desired strength/stiffness properties.
Con: Despite theoretical structural possibilities and advantages, carbon fiber frames do not have an enviable record of reliability, and one continuing problem are the joints and connections.
There is evidence suggesting that long-term exposure to UV rays is damaging to the resins that bond carbon fiber. Failures tend to be sudden, and on-the-trip repairs are practically impossible.
© Rivendell Bicycle Works 2000
and. . .
Carbon fiber frames have a short life span, but are great for long road riding (biathalons, triathalons). Carbon is not recommended for off-road bicycle frames.
These two exerpts are taken fro different websites. Is this true? I don't want to spend a wad of cash and not have the frame last. Thanks. . .
I been thinking about a Trek 5200 but have been doing some research on carbon frames and am of the understanding that they do not last. As evidence. . .
Carbon Fiber
Pro: Light, strong, and easily tailored to achieve desired strength/stiffness properties.
Con: Despite theoretical structural possibilities and advantages, carbon fiber frames do not have an enviable record of reliability, and one continuing problem are the joints and connections.
There is evidence suggesting that long-term exposure to UV rays is damaging to the resins that bond carbon fiber. Failures tend to be sudden, and on-the-trip repairs are practically impossible.
© Rivendell Bicycle Works 2000
and. . .
Carbon fiber frames have a short life span, but are great for long road riding (biathalons, triathalons). Carbon is not recommended for off-road bicycle frames.
These two exerpts are taken fro different websites. Is this true? I don't want to spend a wad of cash and not have the frame last. Thanks. . .