In respect to your last point, when a bike computer is setup, you input the distance the wheel covers in one full revolution. So the computer calculates how frequently the magnet is passing the sensor to determine speed. Why then would speed be inaccurate on and indoor trainer??? Increased resistance from the roller just simulates the gradient of climbing a hill, the wheel still turns the same distance - so slower stroke, slower speed - Am I missing something or just brain fade at 2300 hrs! ( South Australian time)frenchyge said:Isn't the point of the test to establish your highest sustainable HR? If that's the case then it doesn't matter what provides the resistance or how repeatable it is. You're just going as hard as you can for a specific period to see what HR you maintain. Also makes no real difference whether you use time or distance, although time would be better indoors if you really wanted to be true to the test protocol. As you imply, the speed on an indoor trainer will not accurately represent your outdoor speed, which means your distance is meaningless also.
I will review testing protocol - my main objective is to establish baseline, use this to plan riding program for the Australian winter months ahead and measure program effectiveness.