I'd like to inquire if carrot juice, without the pulp, would have the same amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire carrot. Or, if you made raw apple juice from say, 3 apples, would the juice have the same amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire apples. Are the carbs predominantly in the flesh/pulp of veggies, or in the juice of them?
I'd like to inquire if carrot juice, without the pulp, would have the same amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire carrot. Or, if you made raw apple juice from say, 3 apples, would the juice have the same amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire apples. Are the carbs predominantly in the flesh/pulp of veggies, or in the juice of them?
Any thoughts?
With thanks, Foxglove
Juicing gives you concentrated sugars with no fiber or other components to slow down their digestion.
On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 07:38:50 -0700, [email hidden] wrote:
| |Hello, | |I'd like to inquire if carrot juice, without the pulp, would have the |same amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire carrot. Or, if you |made raw apple juice from say, 3 apples, would the juice have the same |amount of carbs as if you'd eaten the entire apples. Are the carbs |predominantly in the flesh/pulp of veggies, or in the juice of them? | |Any thoughts? | |With thanks, |Foxglove |
The pulp is the good part that contains all the fiber. The juice is the bad part with all the sugar. Sorry!