B
B
B. Lafferty
Guest
"B. Lafferty" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news
[email protected]...
> http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10155.0.html
Perhaps they, the cyclists, should start by declaring themselves part of the
problem.
I'm not certain what to make of Pat. Hein would never have done this.
Perhaps the UCI is finally realizing the ramifications of the problem if not
met in a proactive manner.
news
[email protected]...> http://www.velonews.com/news/fea/10155.0.html
Perhaps they, the cyclists, should start by declaring themselves part of the
problem.
I'm not certain what to make of Pat. Hein would never have done this.
Perhaps the UCI is finally realizing the ramifications of the problem if not
met in a proactive manner.
P
Do not hold your breath. McQuaid may have done a noble thing, but the
team owners (who essentially control the UCI) will have his head on a
platter if he goes as far as to shut-out a significant number of their
riders. Right now, the owners are willing to sacrafice the usual small
percentage of riders that get busted each year. They won't stand for
another Festina though.
B. Lafferty wrote:
snipped
> Perhaps the UCI is finally realizing the ramifications of the problem if not
> met in a proactive manner.
team owners (who essentially control the UCI) will have his head on a
platter if he goes as far as to shut-out a significant number of their
riders. Right now, the owners are willing to sacrafice the usual small
percentage of riders that get busted each year. They won't stand for
another Festina though.
B. Lafferty wrote:
snipped
> Perhaps the UCI is finally realizing the ramifications of the problem if not
> met in a proactive manner.
