Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chainring size ( diameter )

Started by yaquaman1 · · Last activity · 4 posts · 6,833 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
6 October 2006
Last activity
7 October 2006
Original author
yaquaman1
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
6,833
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Can anyone help me figure out the diameter of the following chainrings: 42, 50, 52, and 53? I am looking at doing some modifications to my bike for better offroad / trail ( distance riding on hardpack) the bike is a Proflex 856.

    Thank You

  2. Each link is 1/2",
    that means 1/2" between the centres of each tooth,
    42 teeth, 21 inches around.
    Diameter, divide 21 inchec by Pi, 3.1418,
    that will give the diameter at the centre of the chain,
    add on half an inch for the top of the teeth. 🙂

    Lets see how many more opinions we get, while I measure them for you. 😄

    A Mountain Bike I moded earlier: http://www.cyclingforums.com/t363004.html

    OK, a little difficult without a caliper, so give me some tolerence here, I used a plastic ruler:
    42t = 175mm
    48t = 200mm
    50t don't have one
    52t = 218mm
    53t = 225mm

  3. yaquaman1 said:

    Can anyone help me figure out the diameter of the following chainrings: 42, 50, 52, and 53? I am looking at doing some modifications to my bike for better offroad / trail ( distance riding on hardpack) the bike is a Proflex 856.

    Thank You

    From a practical point, if you just want to know which 130BCD chainring combination can be swapped for a 104BCD crank, then a 52/39 with a 118mm ISIS (possibly, the BB spindle you already have ... instead of the "normal" 113mm ISIS spindle for a ROAD double) will probably clear the chainstays -- it does on my hardtail.

    A 53t chainring is shy of about 1/8" larger in diameter than a 52t chainring ... so, clearance could be really iffy.

  4. gclark8 said:

    Each link is 1/2",
    that means 1/2" between the centres of each tooth,
    42 teeth, 21 inches around.
    Diameter, divide 21 inchec by Pi, 3.1418,
    that will give the diameter at the centre of the chain,
    add on half an inch for the top of the teeth. 🙂

    Lets see how many more opinions we get, while I measure them for you. 😄

    A Mountain Bike I moded earlier: cyclingforums.comt363004.html

    OK, a little difficult without a caliper, so give me some tolerence here, I used a plastic ruler:
    42t = 175mm
    48t = 200mm
    50t don't have one
    52t = 218mm
    53t = 225mm

    Each link includes the part which runs on the inside of the larger width part. Each part is 1/2", 1 link is 1 inch I am pretty sure. Half link chains are in existence. I just built a single speed MTB and had to use a half link because of the 1/2" too long/short problem

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.