Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Chamois Position?

Started by Shawn Amir · · Last activity · 5 posts · 646 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
1 August 2005
Last activity
4 August 2005
Original author
Shawn Amir
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
646
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I recently snagged a very nice pair of Pearl Izumi shorts on Ebay--they seem
    absolutely exquisite in material and workmanship. The chamois appears to be
    of the sculpted foam multi-layer variety and looks like a work of art in
    itself.

    Alas, when on a road bike, my sit bones end up on the thinnest part of the
    padding while the fancy cushioned area sits high-up on my glutes where there
    is no contact with the saddle. I am 6ft tall, 32in waist, 39in hips and the
    shorts are size Large--I have been wearing Large PI shorts, albeit cheaper
    models, for many many years now.

    Am I correct in assuming that the thicker padded area belongs under the sit
    bones? If so, do other people have similar problems with chamois placement?
    Can one re-position the chamois 2in more forward somehow? Are they shorter
    (or placed more forward) in different sizes or brands? Any
    ideas/information will be much appreciated.

    Cheers, Shawn

  2. I have the same problem with many shorts, including PI. Thought it was
    my big butt. That is why my next pair is not going to mail order.
    Perhaps when I find what works best, I will order IDENTICAL ones. I
    have noticed other riders wearing Hincape shorts that look like the
    chamios is in the correct location. Unfortunately I never see them in
    bike shops?

    David

    Shawn Amir said:

    I recently snagged a very nice pair of Pearl Izumi shorts on Ebay--they seem
    absolutely exquisite in material and workmanship. The chamois appears to be
    of the sculpted foam multi-layer variety and looks like a work of art in
    itself.

    Alas, when on a road bike, my sit bones end up on the thinnest part of the
    padding while the fancy cushioned area sits high-up on my glutes where there
    is no contact with the saddle. I am 6ft tall, 32in waist, 39in hips and the
    shorts are size Large--I have been wearing Large PI shorts, albeit cheaper
    models, for many many years now.

    Am I correct in assuming that the thicker padded area belongs under the sit
    bones? If so, do other people have similar problems with chamois placement?
    Can one re-position the chamois 2in more forward somehow? Are they shorter
    (or placed more forward) in different sizes or brands? Any
    ideas/information will be much appreciated.

    Cheers, Shawn

  3. "David N. Makinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have the same problem with many shorts, including PI. Thought it was my
    big butt. That is why my next pair is not going to mail order. Perhaps
    when I find what works best, I will order IDENTICAL ones. I have noticed
    other riders wearing Hincape shorts that look like the chamios is in the
    correct location. Unfortunately I never see them in bike shops?

    David

    What is the proper etiquette for trying these things on in the shop?
    Determining whether the chamois is correctly positioned seems a task best
    performed at home...

    I keep thinking that I am missing something obvious. How can such a
    well-known producer of bicycling shorts not know where the sit bones are
    located--assuming mine are in the normal place?

    Cheers, Shawn

  4. It would not hurt to keep your underwear on for this trial. Most shops
    have a dressing room and expect you to be able to try them on.

    I cannot comment on why they would not get it, only that it seems common
    in my case as well.

    David

    Shawn Amir said:

    "David N. Makinson" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    I have the same problem with many shorts, including PI. Thought it was my
    big butt. That is why my next pair is not going to mail order. Perhaps
    when I find what works best, I will order IDENTICAL ones. I have noticed
    other riders wearing Hincape shorts that look like the chamios is in the
    correct location. Unfortunately I never see them in bike shops?

    David

    What is the proper etiquette for trying these things on in the shop?
    Determining whether the chamois is correctly positioned seems a task best
    performed at home...

    I keep thinking that I am missing something obvious. How can such a
    well-known producer of bicycling shorts not know where the sit bones are
    located--assuming mine are in the normal place?

    Cheers, Shawn

  5. Per Shawn Amir:

    Quoted message said:

    I keep thinking that I am missing something obvious. How can such a
    well-known producer of bicycling shorts not know where the sit bones are
    located--assuming mine are in the normal place?

    The same way Sebago can market two models of "Dockides". Both are size 15, one
    is a full 3/4" longer than the other.

    I wonder if the Germans have a DIN standard for pad placement...
    --
    PeteCresswell

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.