Originally posted by hwttdz
After talking to some people who have owned alex 320 and finding a place to get a cheap pair that is my new preference....
...if "aero" wheels offer little to no advantage, and the ultegra/open pros are very similar to my current pair I see little point in spending money on them, but if I were to start from scratch those two would have my vote.
Hwttdz, I have to agree with the rest of the pack here. You mention advantages and question the "point in spending money" on a given wheelset, and I think you need to listen closely to yourself on this one.
For $200, you can get a perfectly durable wheelset at a reasonable weight that will be of better general quality than what you're currently riding (CPX22s with Tiagra hubs, right?); the other guys here have offered some pretty good suggestions in that department... particularly
boudreaux's Ultegra/OpenPro tip.
If you buy new, what you're
not going to get for $200 is anything of better
quality than this combo, or anything with a
real aero advantage. A Zipp 404, Mavic Carbone, or Campy Bora can shave real time off of your fast rides -- but at $200, you should be shopping for quality and reliability. The Alex 320s are
not your best buy where quality and reliability are concerned, in my opinion. And as boudreaux pointed out, those rims are too shallow to make their depth a selling point.
Regarding your bladed spokes question -- this is debatable. It's not necessarily in debate that an aerodynamically designed spoke can make your bike faster... what's in debate is how you define an aerodynamically designed spoke. The jury's still out on that one, from what I understand. There are good arguments to suggest that the Shimano/Mavic-style bladed jobs can be bested by other designs, like subtle ovals; there's also the argument that efficiency in crosswinds is a negating factor. Bladed spokes are neat, and probably have their perks (I've got 'em), but round spokes aren't going anywhere and are in use on many high-end wheels.
Good luck with your choices.