Road Cycling · Public discussion

Chiappucci got it right concerning Pantani

Started by Bestest Handsan · · Last activity · 4 posts · 553 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Road Cycling
Published
16 February 2004
Last activity
16 February 2004
Original author
Bestest Handsan
Posts
4
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
553
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–4 of 4
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Claudio Chiappucci, ex-pro: "There's not a lot to say. Marco has gone away. The only thing that I
    don't like is now that his death will be sensationalized. A few hours ago, lots of people were
    pointing their fingers against him, now everybody is saying he was a great cyclist. Pantani could
    have used more friends when he was alive."

    Unfortunately I think that's how most of people in that situation are treated. Hopefully we can all
    remember to be friends BEFORE we need to eulogize them.

    Or U-goog-ilize them as Zoolander would say.

  2. Bestest Handsander said:

    Claudio Chiappucci, ex-pro: "There's not a lot to say. Marco has gone away. The only thing that I
    don't like is now that his death will be sensationalized. A few hours ago, lots of people were
    pointing their fingers against him, now everybody is saying he was a great cyclist. Pantani could
    have used more friends when he was alive."

    Bingo.

    I'm amused how the crude ad-hominums are flying in this group if anyone even remotely suggests any
    criticism of Pantani in these days after his death. Sure, it makes some sense. The dead are no
    longer here to defend themselves, so attacks against them are considered unfair. But is this so
    different than the situation a few days ago? Does anyone even remotely think Pantani was reading
    this group, able to respond? Indeed, if it was known he was, would those slinging the mud have done
    so so freely? Hardly.

    Many of the attacks which fly here are as cowardly as as anything post-mortum. I really wish people
    would show more respect for the living, and not be so hypersensitive about the dead.

    Dan

  3. Dan Connelly said:


    I'm amused how the crude ad-hominums are flying in this group if anyone even remotely suggests any
    criticism of Pantani in these days after his death. Sure, it makes some sense. The dead are no
    longer here to defend themselves, so attacks against them are considered unfair. But is this so
    different than the situation a few days ago? Does anyone even remotely think Pantani was reading
    this group, able to respond? Indeed, if it was known he was, would those slinging the mud have
    done so so freely? Hardly.


    Maybe they think that in his new omniscient state he is now aware of criticisms against him in rbr,
    and we wouldn't want to offend a guy soon soon after settling into death, would we?

  4. Bestest Handsander said:

    Claudio Chiappucci, ex-pro: "There's not a lot to say. Marco has gone away. The only thing that I
    don't like is now that his death will be sensationalized. A few hours ago, lots of people were
    pointing their fingers against him, now everybody is saying he was a great cyclist. Pantani could
    have used more friends when he was alive."

    Kind words from Chiappucci, considering the little bit of rivalry he and Marco had in Claudio's day.

    ---
    Kelly Beard, a.k.a. Mr. K.V.B. Liar

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.