Chicken in a Biscuit

Discussion in 'Food and nutrition' started by STRATEGY, Mar 28, 2006.

  1. STRATEGY

    STRATEGY Guest

    Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    Is it really as delicious with Eazy Cheese as the back of the box
    implies?


    Thanks,

    STRATEGY
     
    Tags:


  2. On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >Hod did they get the chicken in there?


    They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  3. jj - rfc

    jj - rfc Guest

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <da[email protected]> said:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    >
    > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.


    Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
     
  4. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    rfc) wrote:

    >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    >>
    >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    >
    >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...


    Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?

    Peace,
    Carol, ascared
     
  5. jj - rfc

    jj - rfc Guest

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    > rfc) wrote:
    > >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >>
    > >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    > >
    > >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    >
    > Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >
    > Peace,
    > Carol, ascared


    Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
    much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
     
  6. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:50:57 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    rfc) wrote:

    >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    >> rfc) wrote:
    >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> >> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >> >>
    >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >> >
    >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    >>
    >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >>
    >> Carol, ascared

    >
    >Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
    >much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)


    Damn! Those FPs are everywhere. People should be free to eat mutated
    crackers if they so desire. Where's culinary anarchy when you need
    it?

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  7. Dean G.

    Dean G. Guest

    jj - rfc wrote:
    > One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > > wrote:
    > >
    > > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    > >
    > > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    >
    > Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    >


    When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    Dean G.
     
  8. On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >jj - rfc wrote:
    >> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> > wrote:
    >> >
    >> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >> >
    >> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    >>
    >> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    >
    >When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.


    That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    injuries.

    Peace,
    Carol, concerned
     
  9. On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.


    Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  10. kilikini

    kilikini Guest

    "Damsel in dis Dress" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > wrote:
    >
    > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    >
    > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >
    > Peace,
    > Carol


    I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)

    kili
     
  11. Dean G.

    Dean G. Guest

    Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

    >
    > Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    > it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    > postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.
    >


    Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
    way.

    Dean G.
     
  12. Dean G.

    Dean G. Guest

    Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    > On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >jj - rfc wrote:
    > >> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > >> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > >> > wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >> >
    > >> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    > >>
    > >> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    > >
    > >When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    >
    > That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    > would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    > injuries.
    >


    Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.

    Dean G.
     
  13. On 28 Mar 2006 14:14:04 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

    >>
    >> Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
    >> it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
    >> postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

    >
    >Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
    >way.


    Very peculiar. The first time it happened, I was trying to respond to
    the initial post. Thought I was losing my mind. Tried it again and
    it was fine. Went back and read the original again, and this was how
    it was displaying.

    Your post is apparently haunted.

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  14. On 28 Mar 2006 14:15:13 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]cp.com> wrote:

    >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >jj - rfc wrote:
    >> >> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> >> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> >> > wrote:
    >> >> >
    >> >> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >> >> >
    >> >> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >> >>
    >> >> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >> >> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    >> >
    >> >When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

    >>
    >> That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
    >> would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
    >> injuries.

    >
    >Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.


    Well, that's half the battle right there. Do the hammerers each get
    their own cubicle?

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  15. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:37:24 GMT, "kilikini"
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >"Damsel in dis Dress" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    >news:[email protected]
    >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?

    >>
    >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    >
    >I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)


    That would be much more expensive than the transporters that are
    currently being used. <G>

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  16. biig

    biig Guest

    Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >
    > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    > rfc) wrote:
    >
    > >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > >> wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >>
    > >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

    > >
    > >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    >
    > Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >

    I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
    > Peace,
    > Carol, ascared
     
  17. On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:

    >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >>
    >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    >> rfc) wrote:
    >>
    >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> >> wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >> >>
    >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >> >
    >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

    >>
    >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >>

    > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....


    See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  18. jj - rfc

    jj - rfc Guest

    One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    > >>
    > >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    > >> rfc) wrote:
    > >>
    > >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>

    > said:
    > >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > >> >> wrote:
    > >> >>
    > >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > >> >>
    > >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    > >> >
    > >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    > >>
    > >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    > >>

    > > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    >
    > See? That's what I'm talkin' about!


    Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

    --
    jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
     
  19. On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:48:10 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    rfc) wrote:

    >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    >> >> rfc) wrote:
    >> >>
    >> >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>

    >> said:
    >> >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    >> >> >> wrote:
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    >> >> >>
    >> >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    >> >> >
    >> >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    >> >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    >> >>
    >> >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    >> >>
    >> > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    >>
    >> See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    >
    >Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...


    No. That's what makes it so insidious. These people are evil. You
    must remain on guard at all times.

    Peace,
    Carol
     
  20. biig

    biig Guest

    jj - rfc wrote:
    >
    > One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
    > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
    > > >>
    > > >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
    > > >> rfc) wrote:
    > > >>
    > > >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>

    > > said:
    > > >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
    > > >> >> wrote:
    > > >> >>
    > > >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
    > > >> >>
    > > >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
    > > >> >
    > > >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
    > > >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
    > > >>
    > > >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
    > > >>
    > > > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

    > >
    > > See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

    >
    > Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...


    Yes, there were freathers in my chicken foot....<G>.....Sharon
    >
    > --
    > jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
    > ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
     
Loading...