Chicken in a Biscuit



S

STRATEGY

Guest
Hod did they get the chicken in there?

Is it really as delicious with Eazy Cheese as the back of the box
implies?


Thanks,

STRATEGY
 
On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>Hod did they get the chicken in there?

They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

Peace,
Carol
 
One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>
> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.

Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
 
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
rfc) wrote:

>One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>>
>> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
>Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...

Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?

Peace,
Carol, ascared
 
One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
> rfc) wrote:
> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >>
> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >
> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>
> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>
> Peace,
> Carol, ascared

Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)

--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
 
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:50:57 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
rfc) wrote:

>One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
>> rfc) wrote:
>> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>> >>
>> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>> >
>> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>>
>> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>>
>> Carol, ascared
>
>Sssshhhh, that's how they get that extra zingy taste. If you say too
>much, the Food Police will make 'em stop... ;-)

Damn! Those FPs are everywhere. People should be free to eat mutated
crackers if they so desire. Where's culinary anarchy when you need
it?

Peace,
Carol
 
jj - rfc wrote:
> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >
> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>

When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

Dean G.
 
On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>jj - rfc wrote:
>> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>> >
>> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>>
>> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>
>When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.

That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
injuries.

Peace,
Carol, concerned
 
On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

>Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.

Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.

Peace,
Carol
 
"Damsel in dis Dress" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>
> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
> Peace,
> Carol

I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)

kili
 
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.
>
> Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
> it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
> postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.
>

Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
way.

Dean G.
 
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >jj - rfc wrote:
> >> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> >> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >> >
> >> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >>
> >> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
> >
> >When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
>
> That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
> would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
> injuries.
>

Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.

Dean G.
 
On 28 Mar 2006 14:14:04 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Jura gur genafcbegre vf qbja, gurl resort to sledgehammers.
>>
>> Sometimes, I got this in regular English, but this is twice now that
>> it's mutated. Do you use a Transporter to submit your newsgroup
>> postings? I'm not joking - this really happened.
>
>Odd, but it is rot13 encoded. If I did it, then it would always be that
>way.

Very peculiar. The first time it happened, I was trying to respond to
the initial post. Thought I was losing my mind. Tried it again and
it was fine. Went back and read the original again, and this was how
it was displaying.

Your post is apparently haunted.

Peace,
Carol
 
On 28 Mar 2006 14:15:13 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> On 28 Mar 2006 13:22:11 -0800, "Dean G." <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >jj - rfc wrote:
>> >> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> >> > On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>> >> >
>> >> > They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>> >>
>> >> Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>> >> Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>> >
>> >When the transporter is down, they resort to sledgehammers.
>>
>> That would produce non-mutant crackers, but it seems that the company
>> would get a lot of Worker's Comp claims for repetitive motion
>> injuries.
>
>Yes, but morale has been greatly improved.

Well, that's half the battle right there. Do the hammerers each get
their own cubicle?

Peace,
Carol
 
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 21:37:24 GMT, "kilikini"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Damsel in dis Dress" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>>
>> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>
>I thought they used mechanically separated chickens. :~)

That would be much more expensive than the transporters that are
currently being used. <G>

Peace,
Carol
 
Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
> rfc) wrote:
>
> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >>
> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >
> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>
> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>
I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
> Peace,
> Carol, ascared
 
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:

>Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
>> rfc) wrote:
>>
>> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>> >>
>> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>> >
>> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>>
>> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>>
> I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....

See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

Peace,
Carol
 
One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
> >> rfc) wrote:
> >>
> >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>
> said:
> >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> >> >>
> >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> >> >
> >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
> >>
> >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
> >>
> > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
>
> See? That's what I'm talkin' about!

Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

--
jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
 
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:48:10 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
rfc) wrote:

>One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
>> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
>> >> rfc) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>
>> said:
>> >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
>> >> >
>> >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
>> >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
>> >>
>> >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
>> >>
>> > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
>>
>> See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
>
>Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

No. That's what makes it so insidious. These people are evil. You
must remain on guard at all times.

Peace,
Carol
 
jj - rfc wrote:
>
> One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]> said:
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:04:01 -0500, biig <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > >Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 20:38:51 GMT, [email protected] (jj -
> > >> rfc) wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >One time on Usenet, Damsel in dis Dress <[email protected]>
> > said:
> > >> >> On 28 Mar 2006 12:30:56 -0800, "STRATEGY" <[email protected]>
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >Hod did they get the chicken in there?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> They use ultra-miniature chickens. It's a delicate operation.
> > >> >
> > >> >Nah, that's the old method. Now they do it via Transporter beam.
> > >> >Sooper-Sekrit technology, don'tcha know...
> > >>
> > >> Doesn't that mess up the chickens' molecules so they become mutant?
> > >>
> > > I got one with the left foot at the end of it's right wing....
> >
> > See? That's what I'm talkin' about!
>
> Yeah, but does it affect the taste? That's the important thing...

Yes, there were freathers in my chicken foot....<G>.....Sharon
>
> --
> jj - rfc (Jani) in WA
> ~ mom, Trollop, novice cook ~
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back