General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

colloidial silver

Started by Sharita B · · Last activity · 174 posts · 3,341 views

Thread navigation

Jump through the discussion

Go to the original post, the replies on this page, or the latest preserved contribution.

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
11 January 2004
Last activity
19 January 2004
Original author
Sharita B
Posts
174
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
3,341
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 141–160 of 174
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. "Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Rich Shewmaker said:

    "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    I have not asked you any questions.

    "Can anyone tell me about colloidial silver. A friend recommended it for
    colds- she uses it for her whole family. I read alot of good things


    about

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it but some bad and i'd like to know what others think."

    You used a period instead of a question mark in the first sentence, but


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    still looks like a question to me.

    Ah, I forgot about that. And she also asked what "others think."


    Ah! but you cannot "think", you can only recite.

  2. "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark ProbertJanuary 15, 2004" <[email hidden]>


    wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > > no. you are wrong and I am finished discussing this subject with


    you.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > > <click>
    >
    > oops..another side effect of CS..closed mindedness.
    >
    > Sorry that you cannot re-think a firmly held *belief*.
    >
    >
    > I don't have to defend myself to you or anyone else. CS works for me


    and

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    that
    > is all that counts.

    I was not asking you to defend yourself. I noted that you have your


    mind

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    made up, and that you do not wish to think about anything that may


    affect

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    your firmly held belief.


    Like you have your mind made up.

    Wrong. I asked you a gadzillion times for some real proof of th efficacy


    if

    Quoted message said:

    CS, and you did not post one scintilla of proof. You did the CS sidestep
    (with great skill, I do admit) and avoided responding to my requests.

    Provide some decent sceintific proof, not anecdotes, etc. and I will


    gladly

    Quoted message said:

    review them, and, if they do prove that CS works in humans as claimed, I
    will state that.

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.


    science has a long history of being wrong.

  3. "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Sue, doing a google on orac, you will find what kind of "person" it is.

    When you can lick Orac's shoes, let me know.


    When you can produce proof that you are not missing important genetic
    material, let your kids know.

  4. This is the most civil answer yet.
    "Kristofer D. Dale" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sharita B said:

    Can anyone tell me about colloidial silver. A friend recommended it for

    I don't think it is a good idea, and neither does this biochemist:

    http://www.VitaleTherapeutics.org/vtlmntox.htm

    --
    _o Kristofer Dale,
    _ \<,_ ragged individualist,
    _____( )/ ( )_____ statistic at large...

    p.s. Learn and live, http://www.vitaletherapeutics.org

  5. In article <LvlOb.26736$Ar1.17413@fed1read04>,

    JXBrown said:
    Sharita B said:

    Ok so I did lose the old messages - can we do this again? I'm sorry - I
    hope
    you don't mind giving me a rundown of the pros and cons. I just read that
    it's good for pinkeye?? really -

    My goodness, I haven't looked at m.h.a for nearly two years. I pop open a
    newsreader and practically the first subject I see is colloidal silver. It
    just won't go away will it?

    Nope. But it's partly your timing -- there hadn't been much mention
    of CS for quite some time until the last week or so.

    -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
    These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
    "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
    were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)

  6. Rich Andrews <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:

    [email hidden] (soft-eng) wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    Rich Andrews <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:


    <[email hidden]>...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    "Sharita B" <[email hidden]> wrote in news:s0gMb.69873


    $cM1.11999372

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    @twister.nyc.rr.com:

    > Can anyone tell me about colloidial silver. A friend recommended it


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > colds- she uses it for her whole family. I read alot of good things


    about

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > it but some bad and i'd like to know what others think.
    >
    >
    >

    http://homepages.together.net/~rjstan/rose1.html

    The website says it was prescribed by her doctor, not
    by some altie!

    In the 1950's. A lot of things have chnged in the last 50 years.

    It would appear so. Apparently, accepting ones' mistakes
    was considered the right thing to do, back then.

  7. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (XSweetSue) said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    It appears to
    be your choice and decision to form beliefs based on emotions and a view
    of
    the world as you wish it to be, without seeking the immutable truths of
    nature.

    Very typical of too many people who post here in favor of alternative
    medicine, I'm afraid.

    I have not asked you any questions.

    Totally irrelevant. This is Usenet. Anyone can jump into any thread they
    wish at any time they feel like it. I felt like jumping into this one.
    {xss}
    and others may choose to killfile or totally ignore your posts.Thats USENET
    🙂

    I remind you that you're the one who got upset and berated me by saying
    that you didn't aske me any questions. So go right ahead. Killfile me or
    ignore me. Nothing's stopping you.

    Quoted message said:

    {orac}
    Whether you like it or not concerns me not in the least. You, of course,
    are free to jump into any thread you wish as well.

    {xss} you seem to have some issues which likely belong on alt.mental health
    where you can get some help for what ails you.

    <YAWN>

    Really now, that's a really lame attempt at a comeback. Surely you can
    do better than that?

    Maybe not.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  8. In article <[email hidden]>, "mdd" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>,

    Rich Shewmaker said:

    "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    > I have not asked you any questions.
    >

    "Can anyone tell me about colloidial silver. A friend recommended it for
    colds- she uses it for her whole family. I read alot of good things


    about

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    it but some bad and i'd like to know what others think."

    You used a period instead of a question mark in the first sentence, but


    it

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    still looks like a question to me.

    Ah, I forgot about that. And she also asked what "others think."

    Ah! but you cannot "think", you can only recite.

    Says the person who is unable or unwilling to back up any of his
    assertions with actual evidence or logic.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  9. In article <[email hidden]>,

    (XSweetSue) said:
    Quoted message said:

    Wrong. I asked you a gadzillion times for some real proof of th efficacy if
    CS, and you did not post one scintilla of proof. You did the CS sidestep
    (with great skill, I do admit) and avoided responding to my requests.

    Provide some decent sceintific proof, not anecdotes, etc. and I will gladly
    review them, and, if they do prove that CS works in humans as claimed, I
    will state that.

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.

    your mind hardly seems open to me. I would suggest trying this: drill
    hole in brain. flush out debris with collodial silver. post back and
    tell me how open minded you are now 😉

    I would suggest this to you: If you want to be taken seriously, to be
    viewed as anything more than a crank, start backing up your opinions
    with some evidence and logic, rather than emotion and juvenile-sounding
    insults.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  10. In article <[email hidden]>, "mdd" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.


    science has a long history of being wrong.

    But unlike alties, science also has a long history of eventually
    correcting its errors when new evidence or experimentation shows they
    are incorrect.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  11. In article <[email hidden]>, "mdd" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "David Wright" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    In article <[email hidden]>, mdd <[email hidden]> wrote:

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    To do research you would need to use it or monitor people who were
    using it. You, nor your tiny group of losers do not do research.

    Where's your evidence that you've done any? [silence follows]


    Dear Mr. Wright? I have used it and I have monitored other people using it.
    Though I would not share the info with you. You will try to convince
    yourself that my research is faulty or non existent, but the real reason I
    would not share with you and a few others is .... I do not like you, and
    would not [censored] on you if you were on fire.

    ROTLFMAO! No, the real reason you won't share is either that (1) you
    know you have no such evidence or (2) that you have never done any sort
    of "research" about its effects or (3) a combination of (1) and (2).

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  12. "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    Sue, doing a google on orac, you will find what kind of "person" it


    is.

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    When you can lick Orac's shoes, let me know.


    When you can produce proof that you are not missing important genetic
    material, let your kids know.

    Ouch. I was hit by a slow-speed gnat.

    MDD, (*M*ore *D*irty *D*iapers?) please do not post your personal
    information.

  13. "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    Like you have your mind made up.

    Wrong. I asked you a gadzillion times for some real proof of th efficacy


    if

    Quoted message said:

    CS, and you did not post one scintilla of proof. You did the CS sidestep
    (with great skill, I do admit) and avoided responding to my requests.

    Provide some decent sceintific proof, not anecdotes, etc. and I will


    gladly

    Quoted message said:

    review them, and, if they do prove that CS works in humans as claimed, I
    will state that.

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.

    your mind hardly seems open to me. I would suggest trying this:
    drill hole in brain. flush out debris with collodial silver. post back and


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    me how
    open minded you are now 😉

    Sadly, you and MDD have lived in a clueless envrionment far too long.

    BTW, I do acknowledge that both you and MDD have 3rd degree open minds. That
    is the condition where the mind was so open, the brain fell out.

  14. "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark ProbertJanuary 15, 2004" <[email hidden]>


    wrote

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    in message news:[email hidden]...
    >
    > "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    > news:[email hidden]...
    > >
    > > > no. you are wrong and I am finished discussing this subject with


    you.

    Quoted message said:

    > > > <click>
    > >
    > > oops..another side effect of CS..closed mindedness.
    > >
    > > Sorry that you cannot re-think a firmly held *belief*.
    > >
    > >
    > > I don't have to defend myself to you or anyone else. CS works for


    me

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    and

    Quoted message said:

    > that
    > > is all that counts.
    >
    > I was not asking you to defend yourself. I noted that you have your


    mind

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    > made up, and that you do not wish to think about anything that may


    affect

    Quoted message said:

    > your firmly held belief.
    >
    >
    >
    Like you have your mind made up.

    Wrong. I asked you a gadzillion times for some real proof of th efficacy


    if

    Quoted message said:

    CS, and you did not post one scintilla of proof. You did the CS sidestep
    (with great skill, I do admit) and avoided responding to my requests.

    Provide some decent sceintific proof, not anecdotes, etc. and I will


    gladly

    Quoted message said:

    review them, and, if they do prove that CS works in humans as claimed, I
    will state that.

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.


    science has a long history of being wrong.

    You have no history of being right. Provide some real proof.

  15. "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This is the most civil answer yet.

    You were treated civilly, but chose to become childish on your own.

    Quoted message said:

    "Kristofer D. Dale" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Sharita B said:

    Can anyone tell me about colloidial silver. A friend recommended it


    for

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:


    I don't think it is a good idea, and neither does this biochemist:

    http://www.VitaleTherapeutics.org/vtlmntox.htm

    --
    _o Kristofer Dale,
    _ \<,_ ragged individualist,
    _____( )/ ( )_____ statistic at large...

    p.s. Learn and live, http://www.vitaletherapeutics.org

  16. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:

    This is the most civil answer yet.

    You were treated civilly, but chose to become childish on your own.

    "mdd" apparently confuses legitimate challenges to his assertions and
    requests for evidence to support them with incivility.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  17. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]> wrote
    in message news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.


    science has a long history of being wrong.

    You have no history of being right. Provide some real proof.

    Indeed. And, unlike mdd and his ilk, science has a long history of
    admitting and correcting itself when new evidence and experiments reveal
    its errors.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  18. In article <[email hidden]>,
    "Mark ProbertJanuary 16, 2004" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    "XSweetSue" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:
    Quoted message said:

    My mind is open. Now, open your keyboard and start proving.

    your mind hardly seems open to me. I would suggest trying this:
    drill hole in brain. flush out debris with collodial silver. post back and


    tell

    Quoted message said:

    me how
    open minded you are now 😉

    Sadly, you and MDD have lived in a clueless envrionment far too long.

    BTW, I do acknowledge that both you and MDD have 3rd degree open minds. That
    is the condition where the mind was so open, the brain fell out.

    Alas, it is a condition all too common among alties. They seem to equate
    having an open mind with uncritically accepting all sorts of assertions
    that have no evidence or even sound reasoning to support them. Having an
    "open mind" does not mean one has to give up one's critical thinking
    abilities.

    --
    Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
    |
    |"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
    | inconvenience me with questions?"

  19. "Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    ROTLFMAO! Heh heh heh!

  20. "mdd" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    "Orac" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    ROTLFMAO! Heh heh heh!


    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8632503&dopt=Abstract

    From this: "CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize the lack of established effectiveness
    and potential toxicity of these products."

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=855866&dopt=Abstract

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=529874&dopt=Abstract

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11107524&dopt=Abstract

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12780705&dopt=Abstract

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12839605&dopt=Abstract

    If you have data to the contrary, please submit it.

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.