Compact crank or 53/39?

[CampyO]

OK, opinions please... I'm 45 and in OK shape, riding a 53/39 with usually a
12-25 or 13-26 cassette. I can handle the hills with a little work (I'm not
triple material yet), but find that when I'm just cruising along (on level
pavement), I'm usually in the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I
the kind of guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? If yes, keep the
same size cassette?

Thanks in advance.
Tom

 

[Terry Morse]

CampyO wrote:

> OK, opinions please... I'm 45 and in OK shape, riding a 53/39
> with usually a 12-25 or 13-26 cassette. I can handle the hills
> with a little work (I'm not triple material yet), but find that
> when I'm just cruising along (on level pavement), I'm usually in
> the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I the kind of
> guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? If yes, keep
> the same size cassette?

First of all, as the almost-46-year-old owner of a triple, I'm
tempted to rip your legs off for that "not triple material yet"
crack. But I'll let it slide this time.

Secondly, if you're handling the local hills with what you have, why
change out the gearing? You may find that your highest gear with a
compact is too low sometimes (50/12 vs 53/12). If you think you need
a little lower gear for the hills, a 12-27 cassette or even a 12-30
is a cheaper alternative. Or you can have two rear wheels, a
"climbing" wheel and a "go fast" wheel.

But that's not what I use, and I live to climb hills. I climb almost
all the time in a 42/24 or 42/27. But when things get really steep,
about 14% or more, I bring out the little ring and use 30/21 or
30/24. Sitting and spinning is much more pleasant over time than
standing and mashing. There is no honor to pushing a big gear up a
long, steep hill.
--
terry morse Palo Alto, CA http://bike.terrymorse.com/
year's goal: 200 vert. miles, total to date: 112 vert. miles

 

[Dan Daniel]

On 01 Jul 2004 21:45:43 GMT, [email protected] (CampyO) wrote:

>OK, opinions please... I'm 45 and in OK shape, riding a 53/39 with usually a
>12-25 or 13-26 cassette. I can handle the hills with a little work (I'm not
>triple material yet), but find that when I'm just cruising along (on level
>pavement), I'm usually in the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I
>the kind of guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? If yes, keep the
>same size cassette?
>
>Thanks in advance.
>Tom

What are you using at the top end? I'd say the basic way to figure out
gearing is to decide on the bottom and the top and see how to fill in
the spaces. Since I never use the top end of my gearing, I am ok with
a 48/39. If I found a good deal on a crank, I'd go for a 110 BCD,
probably a triple. And put a 48/36 on it. You don't have to put a
chainwheel on the inner mounts until you need it.

That's on one bike, another has 46/36/26 and 11-28.

As usual, Sheldon Brown's site has something helpful-

http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/index.html

Start inputting what you have, what you use, and then start playing
around with other gearings.

 

[CampyO]

Thanks for the input so far... and apologies for unintentionally dispariging
the triple folks. One reason I'd prefer not switching to a triple... Campy
Record front and rear derailleurs. I should have specified that in my first
post. A compact crank would let me keep 'em.

 

[WooGoogle]

Dan Daniel <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On 01 Jul 2004 21:45:43 GMT, [email protected] (CampyO) wrote:
>
> >OK, opinions please... I'm 45 and in OK shape, riding a 53/39 with usually a
> >12-25 or 13-26 cassette. I can handle the hills with a little work (I'm not
> >triple material yet), but find that when I'm just cruising along (on level
> >pavement), I'm usually in the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I
> >the kind of guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? If yes, keep the
> >same size cassette?
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >Tom
>
> What are you using at the top end? I'd say the basic way to figure out
> gearing is to decide on the bottom and the top and see how to fill in
> the spaces. Since I never use the top end of my gearing, I am ok with
> a 48/39. If I found a good deal on a crank, I'd go for a 110 BCD,
> probably a triple. And put a 48/36 on it. You don't have to put a
> chainwheel on the inner mounts until you need it.
>
> That's on one bike, another has 46/36/26 and 11-28.
>
> As usual, Sheldon Brown's site has something helpful-
>
> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/index.html
>
> Start inputting what you have, what you use, and then start playing
> around with other gearings.
Not mounting the inner chainring on a triple can be a very bad
mistake. On some bikes and cranks, the chain can slip in between the
posts for the inner chainring and the frame, and be very difficult to
dislodge. If your crank has spacers instead of forged posts for the
inner you will not have this problem.

 

[Dominic Sansom]

I'm on the chunky side and was finding it hard getting up them-there-
hills. I was thinking about changing my double to a triple and I posted
a requst for help.

The best advice was to get a compact crank which I did. I didn't have to
change any other components (just moved the FD down a fraction). I works
great... I hill further, higher, stronger everyday.



--

 

[Ritch]

Dan Daniel <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> On 01 Jul 2004 21:45:43 GMT, [email protected] (CampyO) wrote:
>
> >OK, opinions please... I'm 45 and in OK shape, riding a 53/39 with usually a
> >12-25 or 13-26 cassette. I can handle the hills with a little work (I'm not
> >triple material yet), but find that when I'm just cruising along (on level
> >pavement), I'm usually in the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I
> >the kind of guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? If yes, keep the
> >same size cassette?
> >
> >Thanks in advance.
> >Tom
>
> What are you using at the top end? I'd say the basic way to figure out
> gearing is to decide on the bottom and the top and see how to fill in
> the spaces. Since I never use the top end of my gearing, I am ok with
> a 48/39. If I found a good deal on a crank, I'd go for a 110 BCD,
> probably a triple. And put a 48/36 on it. You don't have to put a
> chainwheel on the inner mounts until you need it.
>
> That's on one bike, another has 46/36/26 and 11-28.
>
> As usual, Sheldon Brown's site has something helpful-
>
> http://www.sheldonbrown.com/gears/index.html
>
> Start inputting what you have, what you use, and then start playing
> around with other gearings.

If it was me, I'd go for the 48/36 double (which would require 110
BCD). A 36/26 granny is low enough for most people for most hills
(mountain goats excluded). Plus, you'll get a chance to use the big
ring on the flats. Plus you can keep using your Campy stuff.

2c.
Ritch

 

[Qui si parla Campagnolo]

campyo-<< but find that when I'm just cruising along (on level
pavement), I'm usually in the 39 and one of the bigger cogs (17, 19, 21). Am I
the kind of guy who ought to be thinking of a compact crank? >><BR><BR>

A compact would be a good idea for you, same size casette.

Peter Chisholm
Vecchio's Bicicletteria
1833 Pearl St.
Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535
http://www.vecchios.com
"Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"