Greetings everyone:
The vast majority of everything i have read indicates that pain on the front of the knee can be attributed to a saddle height that is too low, whereas pain in the posterior is caused by a saddle too high.
To make a long story short, for the past few months I have suffered from right knee tendinitis, for which I have been doing therapy and it's slowly getting better. Over the past few days I have swapped out my 175mm cranks for 170mm at the recommendation of the LBS where I just got fitted. When doing so, my bike tech (who doesn't work at the same shop), actually LOWERED my saddle height to get to the point where there is a 26-degree bend in my knee at full extension. He said that my original saddle hieght with the 175mm cranks was way too high using this method. I now feel much more compact and don't get near the leg extension I am used to. I guess when I first started riding back in the early 90's the preferred method was almost a full leg extension at the bottom of the downstroke.
Doubting this, I went to another bike fitter who came recommended, who seconded this method and actually lowered my seat further to get to a 30 degree extension.
Now, this contradicted everything I was trying to achieve by going to lower cranks (i.e., less knee bend), everything I had read about combatting anterior knee pain (i.e., raise the saddle), and my inner voice (i.e., I was always comfortable with a higher position). Plus, this does result in a more compact position compared to the Guillard and other methods that suggest almost a full knee extension.
So, after my first 1 hour easy, endurance zone ride (part of my therapy) with this new position, my right knee is now more sore than ever (after it had been progressing over time) and slight swelling has returned. I am bummed.
My questions are: (1) is the overall method of the 25-30 degree knee extension right, and maybe I just lowered the saddle too much too soon, OR (2) is this a debunk method? I will note that in watching riders in recent years, they do seem more compact on the bike, so maybe the trend is in this direction, but clearly my knee has issues with it.
Any advice?
Mark
The vast majority of everything i have read indicates that pain on the front of the knee can be attributed to a saddle height that is too low, whereas pain in the posterior is caused by a saddle too high.
To make a long story short, for the past few months I have suffered from right knee tendinitis, for which I have been doing therapy and it's slowly getting better. Over the past few days I have swapped out my 175mm cranks for 170mm at the recommendation of the LBS where I just got fitted. When doing so, my bike tech (who doesn't work at the same shop), actually LOWERED my saddle height to get to the point where there is a 26-degree bend in my knee at full extension. He said that my original saddle hieght with the 175mm cranks was way too high using this method. I now feel much more compact and don't get near the leg extension I am used to. I guess when I first started riding back in the early 90's the preferred method was almost a full leg extension at the bottom of the downstroke.
Doubting this, I went to another bike fitter who came recommended, who seconded this method and actually lowered my seat further to get to a 30 degree extension.
Now, this contradicted everything I was trying to achieve by going to lower cranks (i.e., less knee bend), everything I had read about combatting anterior knee pain (i.e., raise the saddle), and my inner voice (i.e., I was always comfortable with a higher position). Plus, this does result in a more compact position compared to the Guillard and other methods that suggest almost a full knee extension.
So, after my first 1 hour easy, endurance zone ride (part of my therapy) with this new position, my right knee is now more sore than ever (after it had been progressing over time) and slight swelling has returned. I am bummed.
My questions are: (1) is the overall method of the 25-30 degree knee extension right, and maybe I just lowered the saddle too much too soon, OR (2) is this a debunk method? I will note that in watching riders in recent years, they do seem more compact on the bike, so maybe the trend is in this direction, but clearly my knee has issues with it.
Any advice?
Mark