A
Anth
Guest
"David Wright" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article
> <[email protected]>, Anth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >They did drop I graphed it.
>
> Yes, Anth, some years they dropped. And some years they
> went up. And they didn't start to really crash and stay
> there until vaccination came in. I graphed it too.
>
> -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
> opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
> have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
> were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Ok I challenge you this :-
Show me one point on the map which was larger than thee 1947
incidence which was 7095. Show me another point on that
graph which is larger than that. You can't because there's
none, you assert that the trends were not decreasing, well
how come there's no points higher than the 1947 incidence?
Also how come every other peak is lower than the 1947
incidence if the trends are not decreasing?. Simply put the
epidemic peaked at 1947.
You assert that the epidemic crashed when the vaccine was
introduced.
My argument is
Now draw curve of best fit across the peaks of the
oscillations and you will see that there's is a clear
downward trend for all the data including when the vaccine
was introduced.
That's my argument which is based on facts, so kindly quit
trying to make me look like a liar.. Anth
news:[email protected]...
> In article
> <[email protected]>, Anth
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >They did drop I graphed it.
>
> Yes, Anth, some years they dropped. And some years they
> went up. And they didn't start to really crash and stay
> there until vaccination came in. I graphed it too.
>
> -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my
> opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If I
> have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
> were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
Ok I challenge you this :-
Show me one point on the map which was larger than thee 1947
incidence which was 7095. Show me another point on that
graph which is larger than that. You can't because there's
none, you assert that the trends were not decreasing, well
how come there's no points higher than the 1947 incidence?
Also how come every other peak is lower than the 1947
incidence if the trends are not decreasing?. Simply put the
epidemic peaked at 1947.
You assert that the epidemic crashed when the vaccine was
introduced.
My argument is
Now draw curve of best fit across the peaks of the
oscillations and you will see that there's is a clear
downward trend for all the data including when the vaccine
was introduced.
That's my argument which is based on facts, so kindly quit
trying to make me look like a liar.. Anth