rec.sport.unicycling · Public discussion

Correct 36"er computer settings

Started by mouse · · Last activity · 3 posts · 119 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
rec.sport.unicycling
Published
19 September 2007
Last activity
19 September 2007
Original author
mouse
Posts
3
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
119
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–3 of 3
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I know I'm on a thread creating spree lately, but a thought just crossed
    my mind. Instead of using the high 2700 to low 2800 number in my
    wireless cycling computer for my 36 inch wheel, would it work to use
    three magnets instead? Two magnets would be okay but not evenly spaced
    out since there are only 9 pair of spokes per side so 3 magnets would
    mean that they would be evenly spaced. Even if this does work, what
    would the value of the "new wheel" need to be to get accurate
    measurements? I don't think that dividing the ~2800 figure of the 36er
    wheel in 3 will work....any geometry majors around?

    --
    mouse

    Quoted message said:

    Originally Posted by johnfoss
    Yes, being old makes you stupid.


    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    mouse's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14148
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/64360

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  2. this should work, just devide your current rollout number by 3

    it takes a wheel of 1/3 the diameter of another wheel exactly 3 turns
    for equal distance traveled.

    it is an inverse relationship

    the computer thinks you are spinning 3X as fast on a wheel 1/3 the
    size:

    3/3=1

    peace

    --
    saskatchewanian

    The Coker isn't elegant, it's majestic
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    saskatchewanian's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/14180
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/64360

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

  3. Dividing the total rollout by three will work for three equally spaced
    magnets.

    Dividing the rollout by two will also work for two magnets. As long as
    the magnets are on spokes on opposite holes. Because one spoke will be
    'leading' and the other 'trailing' then they will be a few milimeters
    off of the center line, although the closer to the rim you are, the
    more accurate they'll be. But in terms of distance ridden, it'll still
    work out spot on. In terms of speed, it'll fluctuate so slightly that
    unless you're looking at it to one 100th of a mph, then I'm sure you'll
    never notice.

    STM

    --
    semach.the.monkey
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    semach.the.monkey's Profile: http://www.unicyclist.com/profile/12078
    View this thread: http://www.unicyclist.com/thread/64360

    Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    http://www.usenet.com

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.