On 20 Dec 2003 23:54:41 -0800,
[email protected] (Dr. Andrew B.
Chung, MD/PhD) wrote:
>
[email protected] wrote in message news:<
[email protected]>...
>> On 19 Dec 2003 21:54:48 -0800,
[email protected] (Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD) wrote:
>>
>> >> Thank you
>> >
>> >You are welcome.
>> >
>> >> for posting without the preaching or diet spam.
>> >
>> >I neither preach nor spam.
>>
>> Many would disagree,
>
>Many have free will.
Doesn't everyone have free will? I realize your distinction though. If they agree, it is the word of
God. If they disagree, it is free will. Very convenient. <g>
>> and have said repeatedly how offensive it is,
>
>Truth can be offensive to the untruthful.
Religious fanatics have a different view of truth. You are also saying you don't care how offensive
it is to others, you will continue to do it. Typical religious fanatic thinking.
>> and have asked that you stop.
>
>It is my choice to remain truthful.
You are again saying you don't care how offensive it is to others, you will continue to do it.
Typical religious fanatic thinking.
>> But I forget how little regard you have for others.
>
>God is my boss. Sorry.
You are again saying you don't care how offensive it is to others, you will continue to do it.
Typical religious fanatic thinking. You feel justified imposing your "truth" on anyone, no matter
what the consequences.
Please stay away from those 2 LB explosive vests. <g>
>> It seems as though gentle hints are wasted on you. <g>
>
>From Matthew 5:
>
>11"Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you
Ahhh. Now I understand why you invite so much criticism. You believe it will add to your blessings.
You might enjoy flogging too. <g>
>12Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven,
I wish you rewards on earth as well. But, then again, 47 virgins awaiting you in heaven is
tempting. <g>
>for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.
Is this how you see yourself, Prophet Chung? <g>
>> Since you do not do what I said, my "thank you" would be meaningless.
>
>Your "thank you" allowed this discourse. It is this discourse that gives your "thank you" meaning
>though your insincerity would otherwise obliterate it.
It WAS sincere, but I don't expect you to understand that. All you see is hatred. YOU were the one
who made it meaningless because YOU said you would not do what I complemented you about. Your doing,
not mine, although I realize it is impossible for you to accept being wrong, even a tiny bit. You
MUST twist what people say to fit your "truth." Typical religious fanatic thinking. Matt