General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Covalent Bond Catch 22?

Started by Tomhendricks474 · · Last activity · 1 post · 518 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
30 December 2003
Last activity
30 December 2003
Original author
Tomhendricks474
Posts
1
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
518
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–1 of 1
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Talking about the origin:

    Covalent bonds are too strong to break without enzymes. That sets up a very difficult situation in
    trying to discover the origin of life. How can a chemical system pop up with both covalent bonds and
    a symbiotic enzyme system all at once with no precursor. To say its just an egg or chicken problem
    is to underestimate the problems this presents.

    "Molecules formed by covalent bonds never fall apart at physiological temperatueres; only at
    temperatures of several hundred degrees centigrade will they decompose. (Note even in my origin of
    life scenario the temp never leaves the range of liquid water though it totters at the high end to
    make the most of high temp in speeding up chemical reactions and allowing for a dry -over 100C and
    a wet - under 100C element to it) Since biological systems function only within a narrow
    temperature range and cannot tolerate high temperatures, they utilize the protein catalysts called
    enzymes, which can break these covalent bonds at temperatures at which life can exist."
    (Microbiology Nester et. al.)

    This paradox or catch 22 has been a roadblock for many scenarios of the origin. Even the RNA world
    with its ribozymes - though encouraging - doesn't seem to quite answer it. We need a system that is
    simpler , that produces many variants to select from, that is powered not by itself (too
    complicated) but by the environment, that depends on chemical reactions not fluke events, etc. IMO
    my scenario suggests a way out of this impasse.

    Comment?

    Tom Hendricks

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.